HYP vs. LCLG
HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) and LCLG (Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for LCLG.
Performance
HYP vs. LCLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYP achieves a 26.28% return, which is significantly higher than LCLG's 16.37% return.
HYP
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- 26.28%
- 6M
- 21.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCLG
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.33%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 33.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYP vs. LCLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 26.28% | -6.61% |
LCLG Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF | 16.37% | -0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYP and LCLG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYP vs. LCLG — Risk / Return Rank
HYP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LCLG
HYP vs. LCLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP) and Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF (LCLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYP | LCLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.83 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYP vs. LCLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYP drawdown since its inception was -19.58%, smaller than the maximum LCLG drawdown of -25.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYP and LCLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYP | LCLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.58% | -25.79% | +6.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.32% | -2.60% | -4.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -4.45% | -1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.45% | — |
Volatility
HYP vs. LCLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYP | LCLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.24% | 19.60% | +23.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.24% | 21.74% | +21.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.24% | 21.74% | +21.50% |
HYP vs. LCLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than LCLG's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYP vs. LCLG - Dividend Comparison
HYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while LCLG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LCLG Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.97% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYP and LCLG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYP is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYP is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LCLG.
HYP has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for LCLG.
They also come from different issuers: Golden Eagle and Logan. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HYP and 0.99% for LCLG.
Find the right allocation for HYP and LCLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer