PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYMB vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYMB vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYMB achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, HYMB has underperformed XLU with an annualized return of 2.46%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.15% annualized return.


HYMB

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.19%
YTD
2.87%
6M
3.18%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
2.46%

XLU

1D
-0.43%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
3.11%
6M
1.25%
1Y
9.11%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYMB vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
2.87%2.04%5.52%7.73%-15.54%5.16%3.74%9.51%4.91%3.22%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.11%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between HYMB and XLU is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2011

0.16

HYMB vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYMB
XLU

Utilities

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

HYMB
100.0%
XLU
100.0%

Basic Materials

HYMB

-

XLU

-

Communication Services

HYMB

-

XLU

-

Consumer Cyclical

HYMB

-

XLU

-

Consumer Defensive

HYMB

-

XLU

-

Energy

HYMB

-

XLU

-

Financial Services

HYMB

-

XLU

-

Healthcare

HYMB

-

XLU

-

Industrials

HYMB

-

XLU

-

Real Estate

HYMB

-

XLU

-

Technology

HYMB

-

XLU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYMB vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMB
HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYMB vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYMBXLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.12

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.00

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.51

2.24

+6.27

HYMB vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYMB and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYMBXLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

0.63

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.54

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.48

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.40

+0.05

Drawdowns

HYMB vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYMB drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMB and XLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYMBXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.57%

-51.98%

+22.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-9.18%

+6.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.44%

-17.26%

+9.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

-25.26%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

-36.07%

+6.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-7.78%

+7.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-10.22%

+6.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

4.09%

-3.21%

Volatility

HYMB vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) is 1.35%, while State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that HYMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYMBXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

5.41%

-4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

11.53%

-8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

14.57%

-10.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

17.32%

-10.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.36%

19.26%

-7.90%

HYMB vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYMB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYMB vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

HYMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than XLU's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.54%4.55%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.72%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYMB and XLU have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLU has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to HYMB (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMB dropped -29.57% vs XLU's -51.98%.

On 10-year performance, XLU leads with 9.15% vs 2.46% for HYMB. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HYMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.15% return vs 2.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYMB.

HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 2.72% for XLU.

HYMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while XLU is Utilities Equities. HYMB tracks Bloomberg Municipal Yield, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYMB and 0.08% for XLU.

HYMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYMB and XLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer