PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYMB vs. TPYP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYMB vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYMB achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 22.03% return. Over the past 10 years, HYMB has underperformed TPYP with an annualized return of 2.35%, while TPYP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.22% annualized return.


HYMB

1D
0.04%
1M
1.10%
YTD
3.03%
6M
3.18%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*
2.35%

TPYP

1D
0.86%
1M
0.08%
YTD
22.03%
6M
22.42%
1Y
24.05%
3Y*
25.50%
5Y*
17.51%
10Y*
12.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYMB vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
3.03%2.04%5.52%7.73%-15.54%5.16%3.74%9.51%4.91%3.22%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
22.03%7.59%37.37%10.51%16.09%34.97%-20.99%23.35%-11.13%2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between HYMB and TPYP is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.05

The correlation between HYMB and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYMB vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYMB
TPYP

Utilities

100.0%
22.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

68.8%

Financial Services

-

2.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

HYMB
100.0%
TPYP
22.0%

Basic Materials

HYMB

-

TPYP
0.1%

Communication Services

HYMB

-

TPYP

-

Consumer Cyclical

HYMB

-

TPYP

-

Consumer Defensive

HYMB

-

TPYP

-

Energy

HYMB

-

TPYP
68.8%

Financial Services

HYMB

-

TPYP
2.4%

Healthcare

HYMB

-

TPYP

-

Industrials

HYMB

-

TPYP

-

Real Estate

HYMB

-

TPYP

-

Technology

HYMB

-

TPYP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYMB vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMB
HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

TPYP
TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYMB vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYMBTPYPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.53

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.86

9.15

-1.29

HYMB vs. TPYP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the TPYP Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYMB and TPYP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYMB vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYMB drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum TPYP drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMB and TPYP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYMBTPYPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.57%

-51.91%

+22.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-6.84%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.44%

-13.17%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

-17.96%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

-51.91%

+22.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-3.72%

+3.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-7.88%

+4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

2.64%

-1.76%

Volatility

HYMB vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) is 1.36%, while Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that HYMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYMBTPYPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

5.30%

-3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.16%

10.26%

-7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04%

13.14%

-9.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

17.46%

-10.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.35%

21.93%

-10.58%

HYMB vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYMB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYMB vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison

HYMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than TPYP's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.54%4.55%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
3.20%3.91%3.95%4.83%4.48%4.86%6.14%4.45%4.58%3.71%3.49%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYMB and TPYP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPYP has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to HYMB (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMB dropped -29.57% vs TPYP's -51.91%.

On 10-year performance, TPYP leads with 12.22% vs 2.35% for HYMB. On fees, HYMB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HYMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 2.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYMB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TPYP.

HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.20% for TPYP.

HYMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TPYP is Energy Equities. HYMB tracks Bloomberg Municipal Yield, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYMB and 0.40% for TPYP.

TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYMB and TPYP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer