HYMB vs. TPYP
HYMB (SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - HYMB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Municipal Yield, while TPYP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYMB returned 2.35%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for TPYP. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYMB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.
Performance
HYMB vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYMB achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 22.03% return. Over the past 10 years, HYMB has underperformed TPYP with an annualized return of 2.35%, while TPYP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.22% annualized return.
HYMB
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- 5.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.35%
TPYP
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 22.03%
- 6M
- 22.42%
- 1Y
- 24.05%
- 3Y*
- 25.50%
- 5Y*
- 17.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
HYMB vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 3.03% | 2.04% | 5.52% | 7.73% | -15.54% | 5.16% | 3.74% | 9.51% | 4.91% | 3.22% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 22.03% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | 16.09% | 34.97% | -20.99% | 23.35% | -11.13% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYMB and TPYP is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015 | 0.05 |
The correlation between HYMB and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYMB vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYMB
TPYP
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
HYMB
TPYP
Basic Materials
HYMB
-
TPYP
Communication Services
HYMB
-
TPYP
-
Consumer Cyclical
HYMB
-
TPYP
-
Consumer Defensive
HYMB
-
TPYP
-
Energy
HYMB
-
TPYP
Financial Services
HYMB
-
TPYP
Healthcare
HYMB
-
TPYP
-
Industrials
HYMB
-
TPYP
-
Real Estate
HYMB
-
TPYP
-
Technology
HYMB
-
TPYP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYMB vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank
HYMB
TPYP
HYMB vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYMB | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 3.53 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.86 | 9.15 | -1.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYMB vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYMB drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum TPYP drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMB and TPYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYMB | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.57% | -51.91% | +22.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.11% | -6.84% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.44% | -13.17% | +5.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.15% | -17.96% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.57% | -51.91% | +22.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -3.72% | +3.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -7.88% | +4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 2.64% | -1.76% |
Volatility
HYMB vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) is 1.36%, while Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that HYMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYMB | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 5.30% | -3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.16% | 10.26% | -7.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04% | 13.14% | -9.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.66% | 17.46% | -10.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 21.93% | -10.58% |
HYMB vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYMB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYMB vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison
HYMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than TPYP's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 4.54% | 4.55% | 4.29% | 4.07% | 3.77% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.95% | 4.03% | 3.78% | 4.08% | 4.54% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.20% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYMB and TPYP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TPYP has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to HYMB (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMB dropped -29.57% vs TPYP's -51.91%.
On 10-year performance, TPYP leads with 12.22% vs 2.35% for HYMB. On fees, HYMB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HYMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 2.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYMB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TPYP.
HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.20% for TPYP.
HYMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TPYP is Energy Equities. HYMB tracks Bloomberg Municipal Yield, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYMB and 0.40% for TPYP.
TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYMB and TPYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer