HYLB vs. ESHY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and ESHY (Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYLB tracks the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index while ESHY tracks the JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. Both are passively managed. HYLB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ESHY.

Performance

HYLB vs. ESHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HYLB

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.65%
• 6M: 2.09%
• 1Y: 6.78%
• 3Y*: 8.79%
• 5Y*: 4.06%
• 10Y*: —

ESHY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYLB vs. ESHY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.86%
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

HYLB vs. ESHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLB

HYLB Risk / Return Rank: 62
HYLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
HYLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
HYLB Omega Ratio Rank: 61
HYLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
HYLB Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYLB vs. ESHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HYLB	ESHY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.90	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HYLB	ESHY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	—	—

Drawdowns

HYLB vs. ESHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYLB drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than ESHY's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLB and ESHY.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYLB	ESHY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.91%	0.00%	-22.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	0.00%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.43%	0.00%	-2.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.53%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HYLB	ESHY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.19%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.92%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.70%	0.00%	+3.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.47%	0.00%	+7.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.18%	0.00%	+8.18%

HYLB vs. ESHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYLB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ESHY's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HYLB vs. ESHY - Dividend Comparison

HYLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, while ESHY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.48%	6.29%	6.31%	5.84%	5.53%	4.45%	5.22%	5.71%	5.95%	5.85%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, HYLB or ESHY?

On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYLB or ESHY?

HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ESHY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYLB or ESHY?

HYLB has the higher dividend yield at 6.48%, compared with 0.00% for ESHY.

What is the main difference between HYLB and ESHY?

HYLB tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index, while ESHY tracks JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for HYLB and 0.20% for ESHY.