HYLB vs. BBHY
HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYLB tracks the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index while BBHY tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYLB returned 3.92%/yr vs 3.99%/yr for BBHY. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
HYLB vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYLB achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than BBHY's 1.90% return.
HYLB
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 5.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- —
BBHY
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 6.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- —
HYLB vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.73% | 8.74% | 8.14% | 12.03% | -10.80% | 3.94% | 5.04% | 14.06% | -1.80% | 6.00% |
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.90% | 8.51% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -10.37% | 3.88% | 5.36% | 14.35% | -2.50% | 6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYLB and BBHY is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2016 | 0.89 |
The correlation between HYLB and BBHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYLB vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank
HYLB
BBHY
HYLB vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYLB | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.33 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 2.66 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 11.84 | -0.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYLB vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYLB drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLB and BBHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYLB | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.91% | -24.98% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.27% | -2.37% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.51% | -5.00% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.54% | -15.32% | -0.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.13% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -2.36% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 0.53% | 0.00% |
Volatility
HYLB vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) have volatilities of 1.00% and 1.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYLB | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 1.00% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | 2.94% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.75% | 3.67% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 7.28% | +0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.16% | 7.51% | +0.65% |
HYLB vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HYLB and BBHY have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HYLB vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison
HYLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, less than BBHY's 6.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.92% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.47% | 6.29% | 6.31% | 5.84% | 5.53% | 4.45% | 5.22% | 5.71% | 5.95% | 5.85% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, HYLB and BBHY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BBHY has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to HYLB (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYLB dropped -22.91% vs BBHY's -24.98%.
On 5-year performance, BBHY leads with 3.99% vs 3.92% for HYLB. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 3.99% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYLB and BBHY have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 6.47% for HYLB.
HYLB tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index, while BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and JPMorgan.
BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYLB and BBHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer