HYGW vs. NHYB
HYGW (iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF) and NHYB (Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYGW tracks the Cboe HYG BuyWrite Index while NHYB tracks the ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYGW charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for NHYB.
Performance
HYGW vs. NHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYGW achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly higher than NHYB's 1.96% return.
HYGW
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.31%
- 1Y
- 6.34%
- 3Y*
- 5.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NHYB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYGW vs. NHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HYGW iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 2.21% | 1.84% |
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.96% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYGW and NHYB is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYGW vs. NHYB — Risk / Return Rank
HYGW
NHYB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYGW vs. NHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) and Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYGW | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.96 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYGW vs. NHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYGW drawdown since its inception was -5.49%, which is greater than NHYB's maximum drawdown of -2.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGW and NHYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYGW | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -2.40% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -0.15% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -0.36% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | — | — |
Volatility
HYGW vs. NHYB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYGW | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85% | 3.62% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 3.62% | +1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 3.62% | +1.04% |
HYGW vs. NHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYGW has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than NHYB's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYGW vs. NHYB - Dividend Comparison
HYGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.51%, more than NHYB's 4.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGW iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 11.51% | 12.53% | 12.30% | 15.98% | 8.71% |
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 4.24% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYGW and NHYB have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NHYB is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NHYB is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for HYGW.
HYGW has the higher dividend yield at 11.51%, compared with 4.24% for NHYB.
HYGW tracks Cboe HYG BuyWrite Index, while NHYB tracks ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for HYGW and 0.08% for NHYB.
Find the right allocation for HYGW and NHYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer