HYGV vs. HYEM
HYGV (FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund) and HYEM (VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYGV tracks the Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index while HYEM tracks the BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYGV returned 3.52%/yr vs 3.02%/yr for HYEM. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYGV charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HYEM.
Performance
HYGV vs. HYEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYGV achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than HYEM's 3.81% return.
HYGV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 6.88%
- 3Y*
- 8.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- —
HYEM
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 4.19%
- 1Y
- 10.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 3.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.63%
HYGV vs. HYEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 1.56% | 7.92% | 8.02% | 12.11% | -12.60% | 5.93% | 8.01% | 15.76% | -4.15% |
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 3.81% | 9.24% | 12.14% | 8.35% | -13.39% | -1.31% | 6.87% | 12.85% | 0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYGV and HYEM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between HYGV and HYEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYGV vs. HYEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYGV
HYEM
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
HYGV
HYEM
-
Basic Materials
HYGV
-
HYEM
-
Communication Services
HYGV
-
HYEM
-
Consumer Cyclical
HYGV
-
HYEM
-
Consumer Defensive
HYGV
-
HYEM
-
Financial Services
HYGV
-
HYEM
-
Healthcare
HYGV
-
HYEM
-
Industrials
HYGV
-
HYEM
Real Estate
HYGV
-
HYEM
-
Technology
HYGV
-
HYEM
-
Utilities
HYGV
-
HYEM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYGV vs. HYEM — Risk / Return Rank
HYGV
HYEM
HYGV vs. HYEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYGV | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.46 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 3.71 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 15.14 | -4.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYGV | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 2.33 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.40 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.54 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
HYGV vs. HYEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYGV drawdown since its inception was -23.47%, smaller than the maximum HYEM drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGV and HYEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYGV | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.47% | -30.96% | +7.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | -2.73% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.56% | -5.23% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.12% | -26.30% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.20% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -4.40% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.62% | 0.67% | -0.05% |
Volatility
HYGV vs. HYEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) is 1.18%, while VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that HYGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYGV | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | 1.32% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | 3.21% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 4.33% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.59% | 7.49% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.20% | 9.27% | -0.07% |
HYGV vs. HYEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYGV has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than HYEM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYGV vs. HYEM - Dividend Comparison
HYGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, more than HYEM's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 6.53% | 6.67% | 6.34% | 6.27% | 6.47% | 5.33% | 5.56% | 6.14% | 5.71% | 5.86% | 6.25% | 7.64% |
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 7.40% | 7.48% | 8.20% | 8.77% | 7.64% | 6.07% | 6.18% | 7.95% | 5.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYGV and HYEM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYEM has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to HYGV (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGV dropped -23.47% vs HYEM's -30.96%.
On 5-year performance, HYGV leads with 3.52% vs 3.02% for HYEM. On fees, HYGV is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, HYGV has been the lower-risk option at 1.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HYGV has performed better with a 3.52% return vs 3.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYGV is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HYEM.
HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.40%, compared with 6.53% for HYEM.
HYGV tracks Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index, while HYEM tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for HYGV and 0.40% for HYEM.
HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYGV and HYEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer