HYGV vs. BSJR
HYGV (FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund) and BSJR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYGV tracks the Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index while BSJR tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYGV returned 3.49%/yr vs 3.37%/yr for BSJR. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HYGV charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJR.
Performance
HYGV vs. BSJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYGV achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than BSJR's 1.11% return.
HYGV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 6.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- —
BSJR
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 4.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- —
HYGV vs. BSJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 1.42% | 7.92% | 8.02% | 12.11% | -12.60% | 5.93% | 8.01% | 2.58% |
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.11% | 7.41% | 7.15% | 11.91% | -11.35% | 3.60% | 5.69% | 3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYGV and BSJR is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between HYGV and BSJR shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYGV vs. BSJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYGV
BSJR
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
HYGV
BSJR
Basic Materials
HYGV
-
BSJR
Communication Services
HYGV
-
BSJR
Consumer Cyclical
HYGV
-
BSJR
Consumer Defensive
HYGV
-
BSJR
Financial Services
HYGV
-
BSJR
Healthcare
HYGV
-
BSJR
Industrials
HYGV
-
BSJR
Real Estate
HYGV
-
BSJR
Technology
HYGV
-
BSJR
Utilities
HYGV
-
BSJR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYGV vs. BSJR — Risk / Return Rank
HYGV
BSJR
HYGV vs. BSJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYGV | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.45 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 4.13 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 19.02 | -7.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYGV | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 2.27 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.50 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.43 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
HYGV vs. BSJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYGV drawdown since its inception was -23.47%, roughly equal to the maximum BSJR drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGV and BSJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYGV | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.47% | -22.58% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | -1.16% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.56% | -3.15% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.12% | -16.37% | -0.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.27% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -3.25% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.62% | 0.25% | +0.37% |
Volatility
HYGV vs. BSJR - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) at 0.57%. This indicates that HYGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYGV | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 0.57% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.02% | 1.45% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 2.12% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.59% | 6.73% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.20% | 9.37% | -0.17% |
HYGV vs. BSJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYGV has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJR's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYGV vs. BSJR - Dividend Comparison
HYGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than BSJR's 5.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.75% | 6.19% | 6.75% | 6.48% | 5.37% | 4.49% | 4.53% | 1.20% | 0.00% |
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 7.41% | 7.48% | 8.20% | 8.77% | 7.64% | 6.07% | 6.18% | 7.95% | 5.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYGV and BSJR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYGV has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to BSJR (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGV dropped -23.47% vs BSJR's -22.58%.
On 5-year performance, HYGV leads with 3.49% vs 3.37% for BSJR. On fees, HYGV is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, BSJR has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HYGV has performed better with a 3.49% return vs 3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYGV is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJR.
HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 5.75% for BSJR.
HYGV tracks Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index, while BSJR tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for HYGV and 0.42% for BSJR.
BSJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYGV and BSJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer