PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYGI vs. RLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYGI vs. RLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGI) and State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HYGI

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

RLY

1D
-0.46%
1M
4.07%
6M
7.44%
YTD
15.77%
1Y
27.64%
3Y*
12.72%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
8.27%
ALL TIME*
4.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.60M$7.84M$7.75M

HYGI vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HYGI
iShares Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
0.00%6.20%9.16%11.71%0.65%
RLY
State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
15.77%20.26%2.53%2.56%2.70%

Correlation

The correlation between HYGI and RLY is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2022

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between HYGI and RLY has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYGI vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HYGI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RLY
RLY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HYGI vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGI) and State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGIRLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.77

HYGI vs. RLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYGI vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGIRLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

Volatility

HYGI vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGIRLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.80%

HYGI vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGI has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYGI vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison

HYGI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYGI
iShares Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
0.50%3.41%6.08%6.22%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RLY
State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
3.06%3.24%3.31%3.71%5.66%12.15%2.16%3.45%2.76%1.85%2.07%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYGI and RLY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RLY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RLY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for HYGI.

RLY has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.50% for HYGI.

HYGI is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while RLY is Global Allocation. HYGI tracks BlackRock Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while RLY tracks Bloomberg U.S. Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for HYGI and 0.50% for RLY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYGI and RLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer