PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYGH vs. FLRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYGH vs. FLRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) and Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYGH achieves a 3.24% return, which is significantly lower than FLRG's 7.49% return.


HYGH

1D
0.17%
1M
0.74%
YTD
3.24%
6M
3.69%
1Y
8.03%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
6.50%

FLRG

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
7.49%
6M
6.89%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
18.22%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYGH vs. FLRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
3.24%6.94%11.22%12.17%-0.92%5.82%5.04%
FLRG
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
7.49%13.92%23.36%18.31%-10.98%29.36%9.90%

Correlation

The correlation between HYGH and FLRG is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020

0.66

The correlation between HYGH and FLRG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYGH vs. FLRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYGH
HYGH Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HYGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGH Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRG
FLRG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FLRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYGH vs. FLRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) and Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGHFLRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.28

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.88

2.31

+2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.08

8.93

+10.15

HYGH vs. FLRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYGH Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the FLRG Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYGH and FLRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYGH vs. FLRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYGH drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, which is greater than FLRG's maximum drawdown of -19.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGH and FLRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGHFLRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.88%

-19.64%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-7.16%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.06%

-16.53%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.24%

-19.64%

+11.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.87%

+1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.22%

-3.73%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

1.86%

-1.45%

Volatility

HYGH vs. FLRG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) is 0.68%, while Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that HYGH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGHFLRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

3.57%

-2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

8.13%

-5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

10.49%

-6.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.07%

15.22%

-8.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.34%

15.03%

-6.69%

HYGH vs. FLRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGH has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRG's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYGH vs. FLRG - Dividend Comparison

HYGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, more than FLRG's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRG
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
1.36%1.42%1.42%1.39%1.62%1.36%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
6.60%6.86%7.85%8.95%6.21%3.74%4.06%4.89%6.45%4.79%4.60%5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYGH and FLRG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLRG has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to HYGH (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGH dropped -23.88% vs FLRG's -19.64%.

On 5-year performance, FLRG leads with 12.45% vs 7.00% for HYGH. On fees, FLRG is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HYGH has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLRG has performed better with a 12.45% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLRG is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for HYGH.

HYGH has the higher dividend yield at 6.60%, compared with 1.36% for FLRG.

HYGH is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FLRG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for HYGH and 0.29% for FLRG.

HYGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYGH and FLRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer