HYG vs. VWO
HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, while VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYG returned 4.97%/yr vs 9.01%/yr for VWO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VWO.
Performance
HYG vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than VWO's 13.82% return. Over the past 10 years, HYG has underperformed VWO with an annualized return of 4.97%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.01% annualized return.
HYG
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 7.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.97%
VWO
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 13.82%
- 6M
- 15.26%
- 1Y
- 32.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
HYG vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.60% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 13.82% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYG and VWO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2007 | 0.57 |
The correlation between HYG and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
HYG vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYG
VWO
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
HYG
VWO
Real Estate
HYG
VWO
Basic Materials
HYG
-
VWO
Communication Services
HYG
-
VWO
Consumer Cyclical
HYG
-
VWO
Consumer Defensive
HYG
-
VWO
Energy
HYG
-
VWO
Financial Services
HYG
-
VWO
Healthcare
HYG
-
VWO
Industrials
HYG
-
VWO
Technology
HYG
-
VWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYG vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank
HYG
VWO
HYG vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYG | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 2.09 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.80 | 2.88 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.39 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 3.03 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.22 | 10.94 | +2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYG | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.09 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.33 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.47 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.27 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
HYG vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and VWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYG | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.25% | -67.68% | +33.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -11.17% | +8.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.56% | -17.37% | +12.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.79% | -32.64% | +16.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.03% | -36.39% | +14.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -15.82% | +12.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 3.09% | -2.56% |
Volatility
HYG vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) is 1.22%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that HYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYG | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 5.41% | -4.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.00% | 13.13% | -10.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 15.83% | -12.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.52% | 17.36% | -9.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.29% | 19.20% | -10.91% |
HYG vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYG vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, more than VWO's 2.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.90% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.37% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYG and VWO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to HYG (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs VWO's -67.68%.
On 10-year performance, VWO leads with 9.01% vs 4.97% for HYG. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VWO has performed better with a 9.01% return vs 4.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 2.37% for VWO.
HYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. HYG tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.08% for VWO.
VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYG and VWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer