PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYG vs. URNM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYG vs. URNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than URNM's -0.56% return.


HYG

1D
0.00%
1M
1.12%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.21%
1Y
6.81%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
5.04%

URNM

1D
0.53%
1M
-9.26%
YTD
-0.56%
6M
-0.53%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
20.14%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYG vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.65%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%2.12%
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
-0.56%40.78%-14.13%57.80%-11.86%78.32%68.36%4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between HYG and URNM is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYG vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

URNM
URNM Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYG vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGURNMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.14

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

0.82

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.25

2.00

+10.24

HYG vs. URNM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the URNM Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYG and URNM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYG vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, smaller than the maximum URNM drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and URNM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGURNMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-50.78%

+16.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-38.72%

+36.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.56%

-50.78%

+46.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.79%

-50.78%

+34.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-35.02%

+35.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-18.09%

+14.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

15.78%

-15.25%

Volatility

HYG vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) is 1.31%, while Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) has a volatility of 17.40%. This indicates that HYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGURNMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

17.40%

-16.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

41.84%

-38.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

52.48%

-48.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.53%

48.58%

-41.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.29%

47.04%

-38.75%

HYG vs. URNM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than URNM's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYG vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison

HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, more than URNM's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.90%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
3.19%3.18%3.18%3.63%0.00%6.70%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYG and URNM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URNM has higher volatility (17.40%) compared to HYG (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs URNM's -50.78%.

On 5-year performance, URNM leads with 12.61% vs 3.75% for HYG. On fees, HYG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, URNM has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 3.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.

HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 3.19% for URNM.

HYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while URNM is Uranium. HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while URNM tracks VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.85% for URNM.

HYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYG and URNM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer