HYG vs. SMH
HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYG returned 5.03%/yr vs 38.18%/yr for SMH. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
HYG vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 79.69% return. Over the past 10 years, HYG has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 5.03%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 38.18% annualized return.
HYG
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.83%
- 10Y*
- 5.03%
SMH
- 1D
- 4.38%
- 1M
- 16.31%
- YTD
- 79.69%
- 6M
- 83.94%
- 1Y
- 152.58%
- 3Y*
- 62.32%
- 5Y*
- 39.72%
- 10Y*
- 38.18%
HYG vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.78% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 79.69% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYG and SMH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007 | 0.52 |
The correlation between HYG and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYG vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
HYG
SMH
HYG vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYG | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.65 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 10.28 | -7.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.11 | 37.77 | -24.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYG vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYG | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.25% | -84.96% | +50.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -14.93% | +12.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.56% | -35.74% | +31.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.79% | -45.30% | +29.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.03% | -45.30% | +23.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -41.04% | +37.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 4.06% | -3.53% |
Volatility
HYG vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) is 1.31%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.71%. This indicates that HYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYG | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 16.71% | -15.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.08% | 27.97% | -24.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 33.39% | -29.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 35.53% | -28.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.29% | 32.86% | -24.57% |
HYG vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYG vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.89% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYG and SMH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.71%) compared to HYG (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 38.18% vs 5.03% for HYG. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 38.18% return vs 5.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.89%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
HYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SMH is Semiconductors. HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.61 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYG and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer