PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYG vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYG vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.32% return.


HYG

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.74%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
8.75%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
5.00%

RBIL

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
2.32%
6M
2.37%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYG vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HYG and RBIL is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025

-0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYG vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYG vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGRBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

2.13

-0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

7.82

-5.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.18

42.95

-31.78

HYG vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYG and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYG vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and RBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGRBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-0.52%

-33.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-0.52%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.50%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-0.07%

-3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

0.10%

+0.43%

Volatility

HYG vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has a higher volatility of 1.13% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that HYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGRBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

0.36%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

0.85%

+2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

0.95%

+2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.54%

1.07%

+6.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.27%

1.07%

+7.20%

HYG vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYG vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, more than RBIL's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.91%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%
RBIL
F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF
4.38%3.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYG and RBIL have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYG has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

On 1-year performance, HYG leads with 5.93% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYG has performed better with a 5.93% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.

HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 4.38% for RBIL.

HYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYG and RBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer