PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYG vs. ANGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYG vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than ANGL's 1.97% return. Over the past 10 years, HYG has underperformed ANGL with an annualized return of 5.00%, while ANGL has yielded a comparatively higher 6.24% annualized return.


HYG

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.74%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
8.75%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
5.00%

ANGL

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.94%
YTD
1.97%
6M
2.26%
1Y
7.26%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
3.25%
10Y*
6.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYG vs. ANGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.56%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%14.09%-2.02%6.07%
ANGL
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
1.97%9.04%6.06%12.52%-14.26%6.84%13.20%18.06%-5.84%9.71%

Correlation

The correlation between HYG and ANGL is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2012

0.72

Over the past year, HYG and ANGL have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.72, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYG vs. ANGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

ANGL
ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYG vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGANGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

1.80

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.18

7.53

+3.65

HYG vs. ANGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the ANGL Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYG and ANGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYG vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, which is greater than ANGL's maximum drawdown of -29.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and ANGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGANGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-29.31%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-4.05%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.56%

-5.48%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.79%

-19.25%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.03%

-29.31%

+7.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.10%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-3.29%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

0.97%

-0.44%

Volatility

HYG vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) have volatilities of 1.13% and 1.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGANGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

1.16%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

3.55%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

4.36%

-0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.54%

7.64%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.27%

9.26%

-0.99%

HYG vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ANGL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYG vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison

HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, less than ANGL's 6.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANGL
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
6.35%6.20%6.29%5.27%4.72%3.90%4.67%5.19%5.99%5.25%5.34%5.81%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.91%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, HYG and ANGL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ANGL has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to HYG (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs ANGL's -29.31%.

On 10-year performance, ANGL leads with 6.24% vs 5.00% for HYG. On fees, ANGL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ANGL has performed better with a 6.24% return vs 5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ANGL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.

ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 5.91% for HYG.

HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while ANGL tracks BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.35% for ANGL.

ANGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYG and ANGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer