HYFM vs. XYL
HYFM (Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.) and XYL (Xylem Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — HYFM in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery, XYL in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 5 years, HYFM returned -72.85%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for XYL. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HYFM vs. XYL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYFM achieves a -44.36% return, which is significantly lower than XYL's -13.86% return.
HYFM
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -14.71%
- YTD
- -44.36%
- 6M
- -51.16%
- 1Y
- -76.66%
- 3Y*
- -54.62%
- 5Y*
- -72.85%
- 10Y*
- —
XYL
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- -13.86%
- 6M
- -15.49%
- 1Y
- -8.91%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
HYFM vs. XYL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYFM Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. | -44.36% | -73.97% | -36.78% | -40.81% | -94.52% | -46.20% | 14.30% |
XYL Xylem Inc. | -13.86% | 18.78% | 2.57% | 4.77% | -6.60% | 18.94% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYFM and XYL is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020 | 0.23 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HYFM and XYL has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
HYFM:
$4.00M
XYL:
$28.34B
HYFM:
-$61.90
XYL:
$4.02
HYFM:
0.03
XYL:
4.08
HYFM:
$122.24M
XYL:
$6.97B
HYFM:
$10.17M
XYL:
$2.71B
HYFM:
-$21.47M
XYL:
$1.41B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYFM vs. XYL — Risk / Return Rank
HYFM
XYL
HYFM vs. XYL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM) and Xylem Inc. (XYL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYFM | XYL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.95 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | -0.30 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | -0.62 | -0.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYFM vs. XYL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYFM drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than XYL's maximum drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYFM and XYL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYFM | XYL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -46.69% | -53.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -83.04% | -30.04% | -53.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.07% | -30.04% | -65.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.87% | -46.69% | -53.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.91% | -23.09% | -76.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.35% | -10.43% | -75.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 58.60% | 14.39% | +44.21% |
Volatility
HYFM vs. XYL - Volatility Comparison
Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM) has a higher volatility of 15.26% compared to Xylem Inc. (XYL) at 7.16%. This indicates that HYFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYFM | XYL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.26% | 7.16% | +8.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.07% | 19.87% | +45.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 99.85% | 24.89% | +74.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.77% | 26.15% | +68.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.37% | 27.29% | +67.08% |
Dividends
HYFM vs. XYL - Dividend Comparison
HYFM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYFM Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYL Xylem Inc. | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.24% | 1.15% | 1.09% | 0.93% | 1.02% | 1.22% | 1.26% | 1.06% | 1.25% | 1.54% |
Financials
HYFM vs. XYL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. and Xylem Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HYFM and XYL have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYFM has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to XYL (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYFM dropped -99.92% vs XYL's -46.69%.
XYL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYFM and XYL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer