PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYFI vs. TAFM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYFI vs. TAFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) and AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HYFI having a 1.98% return and TAFM slightly higher at 1.99%.


HYFI

1D
0.03%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.98%
6M
2.35%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
9.21%
5Y*
10Y*

TAFM

1D
0.08%
1M
0.81%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.26%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYFI vs. TAFM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HYFI
AB High Yield ETF
1.98%8.91%7.98%1.03%
TAFM
AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF
1.99%4.21%2.54%1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between HYFI and TAFM is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYFI vs. TAFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYFI
HYFI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
HYFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HYFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYFI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

TAFM
TAFM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TAFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAFM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TAFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAFM Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYFI vs. TAFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) and AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYFITAFMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.46

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.66

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

9.49

+4.41

HYFI vs. TAFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYFI Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the TAFM Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYFI and TAFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYFITAFMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.24

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

0.85

+0.85

Drawdowns

HYFI vs. TAFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYFI drawdown since its inception was -6.34%, which is greater than TAFM's maximum drawdown of -4.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYFI and TAFM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYFITAFMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-4.74%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-2.69%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.28%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-0.95%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.75%

-0.20%

Volatility

HYFI vs. TAFM - Volatility Comparison

AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM) at 1.00%. This indicates that HYFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYFITAFMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

1.00%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

2.03%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.94%

3.22%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.36%

4.95%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.36%

4.95%

+0.41%

HYFI vs. TAFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TAFM's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYFI vs. TAFM - Dividend Comparison

HYFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than TAFM's 3.63% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HYFI
AB High Yield ETF
6.64%6.66%6.57%4.17%
TAFM
AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF
3.63%3.51%3.35%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYFI and TAFM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYFI has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to TAFM (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYFI dropped -6.34% vs TAFM's -4.74%.

On 1-year performance, HYFI leads with 7.65% vs 7.13% for TAFM. On fees, TAFM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYFI has performed better with a 7.65% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAFM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HYFI.

HYFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 3.63% for TAFM.

HYFI is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while TAFM is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYFI and 0.28% for TAFM.

TAFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYFI and TAFM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer