HYFI vs. TAFM
HYFI (AB High Yield ETF) and TAFM (AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYFI is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while TAFM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HYFI returned 7.65% vs 7.13% for TAFM. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYFI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for TAFM.
Performance
HYFI vs. TAFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HYFI having a 1.98% return and TAFM slightly higher at 1.99%.
HYFI
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 7.65%
- 3Y*
- 9.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAFM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 7.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYFI vs. TAFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HYFI AB High Yield ETF | 1.98% | 8.91% | 7.98% | 1.03% |
TAFM AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.99% | 4.21% | 2.54% | 1.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYFI and TAFM is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYFI vs. TAFM — Risk / Return Rank
HYFI
TAFM
HYFI vs. TAFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) and AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYFI | TAFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.46 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 2.66 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.91 | 9.49 | +4.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYFI | TAFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.24 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.70 | 0.85 | +0.85 |
Drawdowns
HYFI vs. TAFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYFI drawdown since its inception was -6.34%, which is greater than TAFM's maximum drawdown of -4.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYFI and TAFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYFI | TAFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.34% | -4.74% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -2.69% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.28% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | -0.95% | +0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 0.75% | -0.20% |
Volatility
HYFI vs. TAFM - Volatility Comparison
AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM) at 1.00%. This indicates that HYFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYFI | TAFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 1.00% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.10% | 2.03% | +1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.94% | 3.22% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 4.95% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 4.95% | +0.41% |
HYFI vs. TAFM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TAFM's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYFI vs. TAFM - Dividend Comparison
HYFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than TAFM's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HYFI AB High Yield ETF | 6.64% | 6.66% | 6.57% | 4.17% |
TAFM AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF | 3.63% | 3.51% | 3.35% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYFI and TAFM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYFI has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to TAFM (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYFI dropped -6.34% vs TAFM's -4.74%.
On 1-year performance, HYFI leads with 7.65% vs 7.13% for TAFM. On fees, TAFM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HYFI has performed better with a 7.65% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAFM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HYFI.
HYFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 3.63% for TAFM.
HYFI is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while TAFM is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYFI and 0.28% for TAFM.
TAFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYFI and TAFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer