PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYEM vs. PIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYEM vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYEM achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 27.31% return.


HYEM

1D
0.20%
1M
1.41%
YTD
4.43%
6M
4.34%
1Y
9.89%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
3.07%
10Y*
4.65%

PIT

1D
-0.75%
1M
-10.60%
YTD
27.31%
6M
26.74%
1Y
38.33%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYEM vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
4.43%9.24%12.14%8.35%-0.25%
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
27.31%21.63%6.77%-4.54%1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between HYEM and PIT is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022

0.04

The correlation between HYEM and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYEM vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYEM
HYEM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
HYEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PIT
PIT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYEM vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYEMPITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.32

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

2.74

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.81

10.88

+3.93

HYEM vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYEM and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYEM vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYEM drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -14.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEM and PIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYEMPITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-14.05%

-16.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-14.05%

+11.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.23%

-14.05%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-14.05%

+14.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-4.07%

-0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

3.59%

-2.92%

Volatility

HYEM vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) is 1.20%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that HYEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYEMPITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

4.67%

-3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.25%

19.36%

-16.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

21.66%

-17.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.51%

17.50%

-9.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.27%

17.50%

-8.23%

HYEM vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYEM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYEM vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

HYEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%, less than PIT's 7.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
6.49%6.67%6.34%6.27%6.47%5.33%5.56%6.14%5.71%5.86%6.25%7.64%
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
7.00%8.92%3.59%6.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYEM and PIT have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIT has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to HYEM (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYEM dropped -30.96% vs PIT's -14.05%.

On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 19.51% vs 10.41% for HYEM. On fees, HYEM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HYEM has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 19.51% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYEM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 6.49% for HYEM.

HYEM is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while PIT is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYEM and 0.55% for PIT.

HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYEM and PIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer