HYEM vs. JNK
HYEM (VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF) and JNK (SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYEM tracks the BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index while JNK tracks the Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYEM returned 4.66%/yr vs 5.03%/yr for JNK. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
HYEM vs. JNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYEM achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly higher than JNK's 1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, HYEM has underperformed JNK with an annualized return of 4.66%, while JNK has yielded a comparatively higher 5.03% annualized return.
HYEM
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 4.02%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- 1Y
- 10.47%
- 3Y*
- 11.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.09%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
JNK
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 7.72%
- 3Y*
- 8.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.77%
- 10Y*
- 5.03%
HYEM vs. JNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 4.02% | 9.24% | 12.14% | 8.35% | -13.39% | -1.31% | 6.87% | 12.85% | -3.38% | 7.94% |
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 1.73% | 8.76% | 7.71% | 12.42% | -12.19% | 4.00% | 4.95% | 14.88% | -3.28% | 6.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYEM and JNK is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2012 | 0.46 |
The correlation between HYEM and JNK shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYEM vs. JNK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYEM
JNK
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
HYEM
JNK
-
Basic Materials
HYEM
-
JNK
-
Communication Services
HYEM
-
JNK
-
Consumer Cyclical
HYEM
-
JNK
-
Consumer Defensive
HYEM
-
JNK
-
Energy
HYEM
-
JNK
Financial Services
HYEM
-
JNK
-
Healthcare
HYEM
-
JNK
-
Real Estate
HYEM
-
JNK
-
Technology
HYEM
-
JNK
Utilities
HYEM
-
JNK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYEM vs. JNK — Risk / Return Rank
HYEM
JNK
HYEM vs. JNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYEM | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 2.03 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.55 | 3.09 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.39 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 3.08 | +0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.70 | 13.61 | +2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYEM | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.03 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.50 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.61 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.42 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
HYEM vs. JNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYEM drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum JNK drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEM and JNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYEM | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -38.48% | +7.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -2.51% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.23% | -5.02% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.30% | -16.67% | -9.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.96% | -22.89% | -8.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -3.70% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 0.57% | +0.10% |
Volatility
HYEM vs. JNK - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) at 1.16%. This indicates that HYEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYEM | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.40% | 1.16% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.24% | 2.96% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.33% | 3.81% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.49% | 7.54% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.28% | 8.31% | +0.97% |
HYEM vs. JNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HYEM and JNK have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
HYEM vs. JNK - Dividend Comparison
HYEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, less than JNK's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 6.52% | 6.67% | 6.34% | 6.27% | 6.47% | 5.33% | 5.56% | 6.14% | 5.71% | 5.86% | 6.25% | 7.64% |
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 6.61% | 6.54% | 6.63% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 4.27% | 5.11% | 5.44% | 5.90% | 5.60% | 6.06% | 6.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYEM and JNK have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYEM has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to JNK (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYEM dropped -30.96% vs JNK's -38.48%.
On 10-year performance, JNK leads with 5.03% vs 4.66% for HYEM. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, JNK has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JNK has performed better with a 5.03% return vs 4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYEM and JNK have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 6.52% for HYEM.
HYEM tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index, while JNK tracks Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street.
HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYEM and JNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer