HYEM vs. HGER
HYEM (VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF) and HGER (Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYEM is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index, while HGER is a Commodities fund tracking the Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYEM returned 10.72%/yr vs 19.99%/yr for HGER. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYEM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HGER.
Performance
HYEM vs. HGER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYEM achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 24.74% return.
HYEM
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- 1Y
- 9.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- 4.61%
HGER
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -4.74%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 24.88%
- 1Y
- 37.35%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYEM vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 3.71% | 9.24% | 12.14% | 8.35% | -10.24% |
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 24.74% | 20.08% | 9.25% | 1.93% | 9.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYEM and HGER is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022 | 0.11 |
The correlation between HYEM and HGER shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYEM vs. HGER - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYEM
HGER
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
HYEM
HGER
-
Basic Materials
HYEM
-
HGER
Communication Services
HYEM
-
HGER
-
Consumer Cyclical
HYEM
-
HGER
-
Consumer Defensive
HYEM
-
HGER
-
Energy
HYEM
-
HGER
-
Financial Services
HYEM
-
HGER
-
Healthcare
HYEM
-
HGER
-
Real Estate
HYEM
-
HGER
-
Technology
HYEM
-
HGER
-
Utilities
HYEM
-
HGER
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYEM vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank
HYEM
HGER
HYEM vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYEM | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.41 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 4.64 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.72 | 14.85 | -0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYEM | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.20 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.86 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
HYEM vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYEM drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEM and HGER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYEM | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -23.31% | -7.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -8.09% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.23% | -8.84% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -7.50% | +7.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -7.65% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 2.52% | -1.85% |
Volatility
HYEM vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) is 1.16%, while Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that HYEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYEM | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 4.49% | -3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.14% | 14.77% | -11.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.33% | 17.09% | -12.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.49% | 17.64% | -10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.27% | 17.64% | -8.37% |
HYEM vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYEM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYEM vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison
HYEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than HGER's 5.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 5.68% | 7.09% | 3.28% | 7.24% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 6.53% | 6.67% | 6.34% | 6.27% | 6.47% | 5.33% | 5.56% | 6.14% | 5.71% | 5.86% | 6.25% | 7.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYEM and HGER have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HGER has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to HYEM (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYEM dropped -30.96% vs HGER's -23.31%.
On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 19.99% vs 10.72% for HYEM. On fees, HYEM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HYEM has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 19.99% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYEM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HGER.
HYEM has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 5.68% for HGER.
HYEM is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while HGER is Commodities. HYEM tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index, while HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYEM and 0.68% for HGER.
HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYEM and HGER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer