PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYEA.L vs. FKRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYEA.L vs. FKRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HYEA.L is traded in EUR, while FKRCX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FKRCX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYEA.L achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than FKRCX's 4.42% return.


HYEA.L

1D
0.03%
1M
0.88%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.78%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*

FKRCX

1D
0.27%
1M
-5.58%
YTD
4.42%
6M
15.23%
1Y
73.99%
3Y*
48.33%
5Y*
21.68%
10Y*
15.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYEA.L vs. FKRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYEA.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
1.74%1.53%9.22%9.21%-6.45%8.26%-1.76%14.15%0.72%-1.89%
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
4.42%161.39%25.41%-1.03%-18.72%3.15%32.41%54.90%-14.27%1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between HYEA.L and FKRCX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2017

0.04

The correlation between HYEA.L and FKRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYEA.L vs. FKRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYEA.L
HYEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
HYEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FKRCX
FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYEA.L vs. FKRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYEA.LFKRCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.47

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.04

6.81

+1.23

HYEA.L vs. FKRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYEA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the FKRCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYEA.L and FKRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYEA.LFKRCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.87

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.70

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.25

+0.30

Drawdowns

HYEA.L vs. FKRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYEA.L drawdown since its inception was -22.34%, smaller than the maximum FKRCX drawdown of -74.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEA.L and FKRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYEA.LFKRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.34%

-74.19%

+51.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.89%

-30.44%

+28.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.63%

-30.44%

+23.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.74%

-43.19%

+33.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-22.77%

+22.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-37.62%

+35.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

11.00%

-10.47%

Volatility

HYEA.L vs. FKRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) is 0.89%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a volatility of 13.17%. This indicates that HYEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYEA.LFKRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

13.17%

-12.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.38%

33.46%

-31.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35%

40.12%

-36.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.44%

31.00%

-25.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.93%

30.68%

-23.75%

HYEA.L vs. FKRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYEA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FKRCX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYEA.L vs. FKRCX - Dividend Comparison

HYEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FKRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.41%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
10.41%10.75%13.44%3.12%0.00%9.37%10.55%0.00%0.00%0.37%8.73%
HYEA.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYEA.L and FKRCX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYEA.L and FKRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer