PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYDW vs. BGHSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYDW vs. BGHSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) and BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYDW achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than BGHSX's 0.24% return.


HYDW

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
0.77%
6M
1.20%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
6.83%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*

BGHSX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.62%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYDW vs. BGHSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HYDW
Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF
0.77%8.47%5.42%9.84%-7.86%0.96%
BGHSX
BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund
0.24%5.55%9.90%13.21%-10.23%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between HYDW and BGHSX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021

0.58

The correlation between HYDW and BGHSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYDW vs. BGHSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYDW
HYDW Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HYDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BGHSX
BGHSX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BGHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BGHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYDW vs. BGHSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) and BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYDWBGHSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

1.76

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.28

7.15

+5.13

HYDW vs. BGHSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the BGHSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYDW and BGHSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYDWBGHSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

1.49

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.84

-0.26

Drawdowns

HYDW vs. BGHSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYDW drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, which is greater than BGHSX's maximum drawdown of -14.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDW and BGHSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYDWBGHSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.75%

-14.30%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.09%

-2.67%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.64%

-4.55%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.10%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.89%

-3.23%

+1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

0.66%

-0.22%

Volatility

HYDW vs. BGHSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) is 0.74%, while BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) has a volatility of 0.88%. This indicates that HYDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGHSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYDWBGHSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

0.88%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

2.31%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96%

3.17%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

4.48%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.99%

4.48%

+2.51%

HYDW vs. BGHSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYDW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BGHSX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYDW vs. BGHSX - Dividend Comparison

HYDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, less than BGHSX's 6.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BGHSX
BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund
6.25%7.08%7.49%5.23%5.32%4.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYDW
Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF
5.76%5.75%5.35%5.69%4.78%3.30%4.45%4.56%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYDW and BGHSX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGHSX has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to HYDW (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDW dropped -17.75% vs BGHSX's -14.30%.

HYDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYDW and BGHSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer