HYDR vs. SMOG
HYDR (Global X Hydrogen ETF) and SMOG (VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - HYDR tracks the Solactive Global Hydrogen Index - Benchmark TR Net while SMOG tracks the MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYDR returned 14.46%/yr vs 10.65%/yr for SMOG. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYDR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for SMOG.
Performance
HYDR vs. SMOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYDR achieves a 101.95% return, which is significantly higher than SMOG's 17.56% return.
HYDR
- 1D
- -3.90%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 101.95%
- 6M
- 76.41%
- 1Y
- 232.59%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMOG
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 17.56%
- 6M
- 15.87%
- 1Y
- 41.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.65%
- 5Y*
- 1.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
HYDR vs. SMOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDR Global X Hydrogen ETF | 101.95% | 43.73% | -33.08% | -36.49% | -47.24% | -13.89% |
SMOG VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | 17.56% | 33.36% | -9.33% | 1.42% | -29.92% | 3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYDR and SMOG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.76 |
The correlation between HYDR and SMOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
HYDR vs. SMOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYDR
SMOG
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
HYDR
SMOG
Basic Materials
HYDR
SMOG
Consumer Cyclical
HYDR
SMOG
Technology
HYDR
SMOG
Energy
HYDR
SMOG
Communication Services
HYDR
-
SMOG
-
Consumer Defensive
HYDR
-
SMOG
-
Financial Services
HYDR
-
SMOG
Healthcare
HYDR
-
SMOG
-
Real Estate
HYDR
-
SMOG
-
Utilities
HYDR
-
SMOG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYDR vs. SMOG — Risk / Return Rank
HYDR
SMOG
HYDR vs. SMOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) and VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYDR | SMOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.34 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.87 | 4.70 | +3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.50 | 13.31 | +5.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYDR | SMOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.32 | 2.02 | +2.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 0.07 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
HYDR vs. SMOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYDR drawdown since its inception was -89.28%, which is greater than SMOG's maximum drawdown of -84.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDR and SMOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYDR | SMOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.28% | -84.39% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.76% | -8.82% | -20.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.32% | -28.72% | -41.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.63% | -15.04% | -38.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.20% | -52.47% | -11.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.64% | 3.11% | +9.53% |
Volatility
HYDR vs. SMOG - Volatility Comparison
Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) has a higher volatility of 18.28% compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) at 7.27%. This indicates that HYDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYDR | SMOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.28% | 7.27% | +11.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.72% | 15.47% | +20.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.22% | 20.47% | +33.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.24% | 25.11% | +22.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.24% | 25.72% | +21.52% |
HYDR vs. SMOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYDR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOG's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYDR vs. SMOG - Dividend Comparison
HYDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than SMOG's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDR Global X Hydrogen ETF | 1.89% | 3.82% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMOG VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | 1.33% | 1.57% | 1.64% | 1.58% | 1.32% | 0.44% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYDR and SMOG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYDR has higher volatility (18.28%) compared to SMOG (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDR dropped -89.28% vs SMOG's -84.39%.
On 3-year performance, HYDR leads with 14.46% vs 10.65% for SMOG. On fees, HYDR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SMOG has been the lower-risk option at 7.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYDR has performed better with a 14.46% return vs 10.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYDR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SMOG.
HYDR has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.33% for SMOG.
HYDR tracks Solactive Global Hydrogen Index - Benchmark TR Net, while SMOG tracks MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYDR and 0.61% for SMOG.
HYDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYDR and SMOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer