HYDR vs. ERTH
HYDR (Global X Hydrogen ETF) and ERTH (Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - HYDR tracks the Solactive Global Hydrogen Index - Benchmark TR Net while ERTH tracks the MSCI Global Environment Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYDR returned 14.46%/yr vs 3.35%/yr for ERTH. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYDR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ERTH.
Performance
HYDR vs. ERTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYDR achieves a 101.95% return, which is significantly higher than ERTH's 7.61% return.
HYDR
- 1D
- -3.90%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 101.95%
- 6M
- 76.41%
- 1Y
- 232.59%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ERTH
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 7.61%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 21.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- -3.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
HYDR vs. ERTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDR Global X Hydrogen ETF | 101.95% | 43.73% | -33.08% | -36.49% | -47.24% | -13.89% |
ERTH Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF | 7.61% | 18.47% | -13.56% | 0.12% | -27.59% | 1.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYDR and ERTH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.76 |
The correlation between HYDR and ERTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYDR vs. ERTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYDR
ERTH
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
HYDR
ERTH
Basic Materials
HYDR
ERTH
Consumer Cyclical
HYDR
ERTH
Technology
HYDR
ERTH
Energy
HYDR
ERTH
Communication Services
HYDR
-
ERTH
-
Consumer Defensive
HYDR
-
ERTH
Financial Services
HYDR
-
ERTH
Healthcare
HYDR
-
ERTH
-
Real Estate
HYDR
-
ERTH
Utilities
HYDR
-
ERTH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYDR vs. ERTH — Risk / Return Rank
HYDR
ERTH
HYDR vs. ERTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) and Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYDR | ERTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.23 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.87 | 2.66 | +5.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.50 | 7.39 | +11.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYDR | ERTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.32 | 1.29 | +3.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 0.20 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
HYDR vs. ERTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYDR drawdown since its inception was -89.28%, which is greater than ERTH's maximum drawdown of -64.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDR and ERTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYDR | ERTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.28% | -64.45% | -24.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.76% | -8.07% | -21.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.32% | -33.82% | -36.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -51.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.63% | -27.51% | -26.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.20% | -21.47% | -42.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.64% | 2.90% | +9.74% |
Volatility
HYDR vs. ERTH - Volatility Comparison
Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) has a higher volatility of 18.28% compared to Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) at 5.18%. This indicates that HYDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYDR | ERTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.28% | 5.18% | +13.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.72% | 11.81% | +23.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.22% | 16.70% | +37.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.24% | 22.84% | +24.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.24% | 22.62% | +24.62% |
HYDR vs. ERTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYDR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ERTH's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYDR vs. ERTH - Dividend Comparison
HYDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than ERTH's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERTH Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF | 1.39% | 1.46% | 1.00% | 1.28% | 1.22% | 15.33% | 0.21% | 0.71% | 0.61% | 0.87% | 1.06% | 0.79% |
HYDR Global X Hydrogen ETF | 1.89% | 3.82% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYDR and ERTH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYDR has higher volatility (18.28%) compared to ERTH (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDR dropped -89.28% vs ERTH's -64.45%.
On 3-year performance, HYDR leads with 14.46% vs 3.35% for ERTH. On fees, HYDR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ERTH has been the lower-risk option at 5.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYDR has performed better with a 14.46% return vs 3.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYDR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ERTH.
HYDR has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.39% for ERTH.
HYDR tracks Solactive Global Hydrogen Index - Benchmark TR Net, while ERTH tracks MSCI Global Environment Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYDR and 0.55% for ERTH.
HYDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYDR and ERTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer