PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYDR vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
14.75%43.73%-33.08%-36.49%-47.24%-13.89%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
-6.43%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%5.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYDR achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's -6.43% return.


HYDR

1D
0.65%
1M
-5.99%
YTD
14.75%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
117.67%
3Y*
-11.33%
5Y*
10Y*

BOTZ

1D
2.05%
1M
-11.23%
YTD
-6.43%
6M
-4.66%
1Y
19.21%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HYDR vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYDR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HYDR vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYDR
HYDR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HYDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYDRBOTZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

0.69

+1.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.99

1.19

+1.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.15

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

1.03

+3.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.89

3.71

+6.18

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYDR Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYDR and BOTZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYDRBOTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

0.69

+1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.47

0.37

-0.84

Correlation

The correlation between HYDR and BOTZ is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

HYDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than BOTZ's 0.70% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
3.33%3.82%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.70%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%

Drawdowns

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYDR drawdown since its inception was -89.28%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDR and BOTZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HYDRBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.28%

-55.54%

-33.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.76%

-19.34%

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.65%

-14.52%

-59.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.40%

-18.56%

-45.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.42%

5.37%

+7.05%

Volatility

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) has a higher volatility of 13.62% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 8.79%. This indicates that HYDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HYDRBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.62%

8.79%

+4.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.08%

17.74%

+20.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.41%

27.79%

+21.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.23%

26.52%

+19.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.23%

25.68%

+20.55%