PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYDR vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYDR achieves a 101.95% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 10.63% return.


HYDR

1D
-3.90%
1M
2.47%
YTD
101.95%
6M
76.41%
1Y
232.59%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
10Y*

BOTZ

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.43%
YTD
10.63%
6M
9.15%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
12.50%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
101.95%43.73%-33.08%-36.49%-47.24%-13.89%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
10.63%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HYDR and BOTZ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021

0.65

The correlation between HYDR and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYDR
BOTZ

Industrials

84.7%
48.6%

Basic Materials

2.4%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
6.1%

Technology

0.5%
31.8%

Energy

0.4%
0.5%

Communication Services

-

4.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

0.9%

Healthcare

-

9.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.0%

Industrials

HYDR
84.7%
BOTZ
48.6%

Basic Materials

HYDR
2.4%
BOTZ
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

HYDR
2.3%
BOTZ
6.1%

Technology

HYDR
0.5%
BOTZ
31.8%

Energy

HYDR
0.4%
BOTZ
0.5%

Communication Services

HYDR

-

BOTZ
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

HYDR

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Financial Services

HYDR

-

BOTZ
0.9%

Healthcare

HYDR

-

BOTZ
9.0%

Real Estate

HYDR

-

BOTZ

-

Utilities

HYDR

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYDR vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYDR
HYDR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HYDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYDRBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.21

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.87

1.48

+6.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.50

5.08

+13.42

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYDR Sharpe Ratio is 4.32, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYDR and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYDRBOTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.32

1.19

+3.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.44

-0.68

Drawdowns

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYDR drawdown since its inception was -89.28%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDR and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYDRBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.28%

-55.54%

-33.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.76%

-19.34%

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.32%

-29.02%

-41.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.63%

-3.72%

-49.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.20%

-18.32%

-45.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.64%

5.63%

+7.01%

Volatility

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) has a higher volatility of 18.28% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 7.76%. This indicates that HYDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYDRBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.28%

7.76%

+10.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.72%

18.41%

+17.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.22%

23.97%

+30.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.24%

26.72%

+20.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.24%

25.72%

+21.52%

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYDR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYDR vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

HYDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.59%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
1.89%3.82%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYDR and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYDR has higher volatility (18.28%) compared to BOTZ (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDR dropped -89.28% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

On 3-year performance, HYDR leads with 14.46% vs 12.50% for BOTZ. On fees, HYDR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HYDR has performed better with a 14.46% return vs 12.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYDR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

HYDR has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.59% for BOTZ.

HYDR is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. HYDR tracks Solactive Global Hydrogen Index - Benchmark TR Net, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYDR and 0.68% for BOTZ.

HYDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYDR and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer