HYDB vs. RGHYX
HYDB (iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF) and RGHYX (RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, HYDB returned 4.69%/yr vs 4.57%/yr for RGHYX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYDB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for RGHYX.
Performance
HYDB vs. RGHYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HYDB having a 1.43% return and RGHYX slightly lower at 1.36%.
HYDB
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 7.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- —
RGHYX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 6.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.83%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 6.08%
HYDB vs. RGHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDB iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF | 1.43% | 8.10% | 9.11% | 14.02% | -9.99% | 5.14% | 7.39% | 16.13% | -3.18% | 3.38% |
RGHYX RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund | 1.36% | 9.02% | 7.14% | 12.88% | -8.48% | 3.72% | 9.65% | 15.83% | -0.73% | 2.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYDB and RGHYX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2017 | 0.63 |
The correlation between HYDB and RGHYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYDB vs. RGHYX — Risk / Return Rank
HYDB
RGHYX
HYDB vs. RGHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) and RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYDB | RGHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.63 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 2.74 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.12 | 12.69 | -1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYDB | RGHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.78 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 1.05 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.43 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
HYDB vs. RGHYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYDB drawdown since its inception was -21.58%, which is greater than RGHYX's maximum drawdown of -17.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDB and RGHYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYDB | RGHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.58% | -17.38% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -2.65% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.58% | -4.01% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.28% | -12.79% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.17% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -1.48% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | 0.57% | +0.07% |
Volatility
HYDB vs. RGHYX - Volatility Comparison
iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) at 0.84%. This indicates that HYDB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYDB | RGHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 0.84% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 2.11% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.78% | 2.61% | +1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 4.38% | +2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.76% | 4.67% | +3.09% |
HYDB vs. RGHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYDB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RGHYX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYDB vs. RGHYX - Dividend Comparison
HYDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than RGHYX's 6.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDB iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF | 7.00% | 7.04% | 6.95% | 7.00% | 6.30% | 4.70% | 5.81% | 5.68% | 6.16% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RGHYX RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund | 6.39% | 6.68% | 6.91% | 6.22% | 6.04% | 5.29% | 5.54% | 4.88% | 6.79% | 3.88% | 4.44% | 4.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYDB and RGHYX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYDB has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to RGHYX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDB dropped -21.58% vs RGHYX's -17.38%.
RGHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYDB and RGHYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer