PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYDB vs. LDRH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYDB vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYDB achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than LDRH's 1.79% return.


HYDB

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.87%
1Y
7.20%
3Y*
9.11%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*

LDRH

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.79%
6M
2.28%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYDB vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HYDB and LDRH is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024

0.87

The correlation between HYDB and LDRH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYDB vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYDB
HYDB Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HYDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

LDRH
LDRH Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LDRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYDB vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYDBLDRHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.49

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

5.24

-2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.30

21.81

-10.52

HYDB vs. LDRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYDB Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the LDRH Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYDB and LDRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYDBLDRHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.48

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.69

-0.98

Drawdowns

HYDB vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYDB drawdown since its inception was -21.58%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDB and LDRH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYDBLDRHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.58%

-3.17%

-18.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-1.23%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.20%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-0.24%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

0.30%

+0.34%

Volatility

HYDB vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison

iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) has a higher volatility of 1.13% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) at 0.69%. This indicates that HYDB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYDBLDRHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

0.69%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

1.97%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

2.61%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.04%

3.52%

+3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.76%

3.52%

+4.24%

HYDB vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HYDB and LDRH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

HYDB vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison

HYDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, which matches LDRH's 7.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYDB
iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF
7.00%7.04%6.95%7.00%6.30%4.70%5.81%5.68%6.16%2.70%
LDRH
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF
7.00%6.41%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYDB and LDRH have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYDB has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to LDRH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDB dropped -21.58% vs LDRH's -3.17%.

On 1-year performance, HYDB leads with 7.20% vs 6.43% for LDRH. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, LDRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYDB has performed better with a 7.20% return vs 6.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYDB and LDRH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

HYDB and LDRH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 7.00%.

HYDB tracks BlackRock High Yield Defensive Bond Index, while LDRH tracks BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index.

LDRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYDB and LDRH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer