PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYDB vs. CGCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYDB vs. CGCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) and Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYDB achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than CGCB's -0.30% return.


HYDB

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.80%
1Y
6.90%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*

CGCB

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
-0.30%
6M
0.15%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYDB vs. CGCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HYDB
iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF
1.01%8.10%9.11%7.63%
CGCB
Capital Group Core Bond ETF
-0.30%7.29%1.44%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between HYDB and CGCB is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023

0.57

The correlation between HYDB and CGCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYDB vs. CGCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYDB
HYDB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HYDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDB Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

CGCB
CGCB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYDB vs. CGCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) and Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYDBCGCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.22

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

1.65

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.80

4.88

+5.92

HYDB vs. CGCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYDB Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the CGCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYDB and CGCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYDBCGCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

1.26

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.05

-0.35

Drawdowns

HYDB vs. CGCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYDB drawdown since its inception was -21.58%, which is greater than CGCB's maximum drawdown of -5.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDB and CGCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYDBCGCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.58%

-5.17%

-16.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-2.98%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-2.17%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-1.35%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

1.01%

-0.37%

Volatility

HYDB vs. CGCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) is 1.09%, while Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) has a volatility of 1.26%. This indicates that HYDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYDBCGCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

1.26%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

2.83%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.81%

3.91%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.04%

5.38%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.76%

5.38%

+2.38%

HYDB vs. CGCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYDB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CGCB's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYDB vs. CGCB - Dividend Comparison

HYDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than CGCB's 4.24% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGCB
Capital Group Core Bond ETF
4.24%4.22%3.99%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYDB
iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF
7.02%7.04%6.95%7.00%6.30%4.70%5.81%5.68%6.16%2.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYDB and CGCB have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGCB has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to HYDB (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDB dropped -21.58% vs CGCB's -5.17%.

On 1-year performance, HYDB leads with 6.90% vs 4.90% for CGCB. On fees, CGCB is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, HYDB has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYDB has performed better with a 6.90% return vs 4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGCB is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYDB.

HYDB has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 4.24% for CGCB.

HYDB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CGCB is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYDB and 0.27% for CGCB.

HYDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYDB and CGCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer