PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGCB vs. PYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CGCB and PYLD is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

CGCB vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.31%
3.81%
CGCB
PYLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CGCB:

0.26

PYLD:

2.30

Sortino Ratio

CGCB:

0.39

PYLD:

3.32

Omega Ratio

CGCB:

1.05

PYLD:

1.45

Calmar Ratio

CGCB:

0.31

PYLD:

3.93

Martin Ratio

CGCB:

0.69

PYLD:

10.86

Ulcer Index

CGCB:

2.18%

PYLD:

0.75%

Daily Std Dev

CGCB:

5.87%

PYLD:

3.55%

Max Drawdown

CGCB:

-4.90%

PYLD:

-4.52%

Current Drawdown

CGCB:

-4.90%

PYLD:

-0.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGCB achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than PYLD's -0.12% return.


CGCB

YTD

-0.58%

1M

-3.03%

6M

0.31%

1Y

1.01%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

PYLD

YTD

-0.12%

1M

-0.99%

6M

3.82%

1Y

7.96%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGCB vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGCB has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.


PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Expense ratio chart for PYLD: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%
Expense ratio chart for CGCB: current value at 0.27% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.27%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGCB vs. PYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGCB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGCB is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGCB is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGCB is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGCB is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGCB is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGCB is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PYLD is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PYLD is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PYLD is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PYLD is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PYLD is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PYLD is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CGCB vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGCB, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.262.30
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGCB, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.393.32
The chart of Omega ratio for CGCB, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.051.45
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGCB, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.313.93
The chart of Martin ratio for CGCB, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.6910.86
CGCB
PYLD

The current CGCB Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGCB and PYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10Nov 17Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15Dec 22Dec 29Jan 05
0.26
2.30
CGCB
PYLD

Dividends

CGCB vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

CGCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than PYLD's 5.98% yield.


TTM20242023
CGCB
Capital Group Core Bond ETF
3.54%3.52%0.95%
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
5.98%5.97%2.72%

Drawdowns

CGCB vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGCB drawdown since its inception was -4.90%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGCB and PYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-4.90%
-0.99%
CGCB
PYLD

Volatility

CGCB vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) at 0.70%. This indicates that CGCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.70%
0.70%
CGCB
PYLD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab