PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGCB vs. PYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CGCBPYLD
YTD Return2.05%6.85%
1Y Return8.64%13.56%
Sharpe Ratio1.443.41
Sortino Ratio2.095.31
Omega Ratio1.251.74
Calmar Ratio2.196.51
Martin Ratio5.0520.03
Ulcer Index1.73%0.67%
Daily Std Dev6.06%3.97%
Max Drawdown-3.99%-4.52%
Current Drawdown-3.32%-1.05%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between CGCB and PYLD is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CGCB vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CGCB achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than PYLD's 6.85% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.81%
5.41%
CGCB
PYLD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGCB vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGCB has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.


PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Expense ratio chart for PYLD: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%
Expense ratio chart for CGCB: current value at 0.27% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.27%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGCB vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGCB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGCB, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.44
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGCB, currently valued at 2.09, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CGCB, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGCB, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.19
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CGCB, currently valued at 5.05, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.005.05
PYLD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PYLD, currently valued at 3.41, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PYLD, currently valued at 5.31, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.005.31
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PYLD, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.74
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PYLD, currently valued at 6.51, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.006.51
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PYLD, currently valued at 20.03, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0020.03

CGCB vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGCB and PYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10
1.44
3.41
CGCB
PYLD

Dividends

CGCB vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

CGCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than PYLD's 5.72% yield.


TTM2023
CGCB
Capital Group Core Bond ETF
3.82%0.95%
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
5.72%2.72%

Drawdowns

CGCB vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGCB drawdown since its inception was -3.99%, smaller than the maximum PYLD drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGCB and PYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.32%
-1.05%
CGCB
PYLD

Volatility

CGCB vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) at 1.20%. This indicates that CGCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.94%
1.20%
CGCB
PYLD