HYBR.TO vs. QQCC.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HYBR.TO (Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF) and QQCC.TO (Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYBR.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while QQCC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Global X. Over the past 10 years, HYBR.TO returned 8.33%/yr vs 10.62%/yr for QQCC.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

HYBR.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF (HYBR.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYBR.TO achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly lower than QQCC.TO's 16.38% return. Over the past 10 years, HYBR.TO has underperformed QQCC.TO with an annualized return of 8.33%, while QQCC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.62% annualized return.

HYBR.TO

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 2.05%
• YTD: 5.51%
• 6M: 7.51%
• 1Y: 18.87%
• 3Y*: 20.20%
• 5Y*: 7.93%
• 10Y*: 8.33%

QQCC.TO

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 8.50%
• YTD: 16.38%
• 6M: 14.21%
• 1Y: 34.40%
• 3Y*: 23.29%
• 5Y*: 15.56%
• 10Y*: 10.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYBR.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HYBR.TO Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF	5.51%	17.73%	27.83%	6.98%	-15.95%	26.17%	5.51%	0.63%	-10.44%	17.19%
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	16.38%	11.64%	33.48%	35.99%	-8.51%	7.92%	-3.26%	16.18%	-15.89%	18.77%

Correlation

The correlation between HYBR.TO and QQCC.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2013	0.12

The correlation between HYBR.TO and QQCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (5 years) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HYBR.TO vs. QQCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYBR.TO

HYBR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 92
HYBR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
HYBR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
HYBR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
HYBR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
HYBR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

QQCC.TO

QQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
QQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYBR.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF (HYBR.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HYBR.TO	QQCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.81	2.71	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.11	3.65	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.49	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.09	4.24	+5.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	41.05	15.75	+25.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HYBR.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYBR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYBR.TO and QQCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HYBR.TO	QQCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.81	2.71	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.89	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.62	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.00	+0.40

Drawdowns

HYBR.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYBR.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, which is greater than QQCC.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBR.TO and QQCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYBR.TO	QQCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.65%	-36.70%	-9.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.88%	-8.15%	+6.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.27%	-22.24%	+14.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.06%	-22.24%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.65%	-36.70%	-9.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-0.48%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.01%	-8.37%	+0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.46%	2.19%	-1.73%

Volatility

HYBR.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF (HYBR.TO) is 1.89%, while Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that HYBR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYBR.TO	QQCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.89%	3.81%	-1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.48%	10.04%	-5.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.76%	12.77%	-6.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.49%	17.58%	-7.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.82%	17.29%	-3.47%

HYBR.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HYBR.TO and QQCC.TO have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

HYBR.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HYBR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than QQCC.TO's 10.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HYBR.TO Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF	4.55%	4.31%	4.24%	5.28%	5.56%	3.94%	5.14%	4.78%	4.26%	3.70%	4.28%	4.34%
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	10.53%	11.27%	9.89%	11.85%	11.04%	5.15%	5.84%	6.31%	7.90%	6.01%	6.73%	8.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYBR.TO and QQCC.TO in my portfolio?

HYBR.TO and QQCC.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HYBR.TO or QQCC.TO?

Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYBR.TO or QQCC.TO?

HYBR.TO and QQCC.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

What is the main difference between HYBR.TO and QQCC.TO?

HYBR.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while QQCC.TO is Nasdaq-100.