HYBI vs. QQQH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HYBI (NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF) and QQQH (NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYBI is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Neos, while QQQH is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Neos. Over the past year, HYBI returned 7.35% vs 20.09% for QQQH. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.

Performance

HYBI vs. QQQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYBI achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than QQQH's 7.91% return.

HYBI

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 7.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQH

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 4.93%
• YTD: 7.91%
• 6M: 7.82%
• 1Y: 20.09%
• 3Y*: 20.71%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYBI vs. QQQH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HYBI NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF	1.56%	6.97%	-0.48%
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	7.91%	14.17%	4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between HYBI and QQQH is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024	0.63

The correlation between HYBI and QQQH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

HYBI vs. QQQH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HYBI	QQQH
Technology	35.6%	53.5%
Financial Services	11.8%	0.2%
Communication Services	11.2%	16.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	12.1%
Healthcare	8.5%	4.1%
Industrials	8.3%	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	7.6%
Energy	3.6%	0.6%
Utilities	2.3%	1.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.2%

Return for Risk

HYBI vs. QQQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYBI

HYBI Risk / Return Rank: 78
HYBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
HYBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
HYBI Omega Ratio Rank: 74
HYBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
HYBI Martin Ratio Rank: 83

QQQH

QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 62
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYBI vs. QQQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HYBI	QQQH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.09	+0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	2.85	+0.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.39	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.17	2.90	+2.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.91	12.60	+4.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HYBI vs. QQQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the QQQH Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYBI and QQQH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HYBI	QQQH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	2.09	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	0.79	+0.19

Drawdowns

HYBI vs. QQQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYBI drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum QQQH drawdown of -31.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBI and QQQH.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYBI	QQQH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-31.24%	+26.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.43%	-6.96%	+5.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.02%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.62%	-8.27%	+7.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.44%	1.60%	-1.16%

Volatility

HYBI vs. QQQH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) is 0.98%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) has a volatility of 1.73%. This indicates that HYBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYBI	QQQH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.98%	1.73%	-0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.13%	7.34%	-5.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.23%	9.67%	-6.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.94%	13.20%	-8.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.94%	13.37%	-8.43%

HYBI vs. QQQH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HYBI and QQQH have an expense ratio of 0.68%.

Dividends

HYBI vs. QQQH - Dividend Comparison

HYBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, less than QQQH's 8.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HYBI NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF	8.37%	8.48%	2.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	8.74%	8.86%	7.53%	7.18%	9.05%	7.77%	7.48%	0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYBI and QQQH in my portfolio?

HYBI and QQQH have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HYBI or QQQH?

QQQH has higher volatility (1.73%) compared to HYBI (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBI dropped -4.68% vs QQQH's -31.24%.

Which ETF is better, HYBI or QQQH?

On 1-year performance, QQQH leads with 20.09% vs 7.35% for HYBI. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, HYBI has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HYBI or QQQH?

Over the 1-year period, QQQH has performed better with a 20.09% return vs 7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYBI or QQQH?

HYBI and QQQH have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYBI or QQQH?

QQQH has the higher dividend yield at 8.74%, compared with 8.37% for HYBI.

What is the main difference between HYBI and QQQH?

HYBI is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while QQQH is Nasdaq-100.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HYBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.