HYBI vs. IYRI
HYBI (NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF) and IYRI (NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYBI is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Neos, while IYRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HYBI returned 6.27% vs 10.83% for IYRI. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.
Performance
HYBI vs. IYRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYBI achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than IYRI's 7.32% return.
HYBI
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 6.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYRI
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 7.32%
- 6M
- 6.61%
- 1Y
- 10.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYBI vs. IYRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HYBI NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF | 1.72% | 6.95% |
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 7.32% | 6.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYBI and IYRI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYBI vs. IYRI — Risk / Return Rank
HYBI
IYRI
HYBI vs. IYRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYBI | IYRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.19 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 1.44 | +2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.13 | 5.19 | +8.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYBI vs. IYRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYBI drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum IYRI drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBI and IYRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYBI | IYRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -12.12% | +7.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.43% | -7.53% | +6.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.30% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -1.68% | +1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 2.09% | -1.65% |
Volatility
HYBI vs. IYRI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) is 1.27%, while NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that HYBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYBI | IYRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 4.21% | -2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.35% | 7.91% | -5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.34% | 10.74% | -7.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 13.17% | -8.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 13.17% | -8.24% |
HYBI vs. IYRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HYBI and IYRI have an expense ratio of 0.68%.
Dividends
HYBI vs. IYRI - Dividend Comparison
HYBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, less than IYRI's 10.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HYBI NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF | 8.35% | 8.48% | 2.21% |
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 10.99% | 11.72% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYBI and IYRI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYRI has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to HYBI (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBI dropped -4.68% vs IYRI's -12.12%.
On 1-year performance, IYRI leads with 10.83% vs 6.27% for HYBI. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, HYBI has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IYRI has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 6.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYBI and IYRI have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.
IYRI has the higher dividend yield at 10.99%, compared with 8.35% for HYBI.
HYBI is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while IYRI is Derivative Income.
HYBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYBI and IYRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer