HYBI vs. BTCI
HYBI (NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYBI is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Neos, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HYBI returned 7.35% vs -33.43% for BTCI. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYBI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.
Performance
HYBI vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYBI achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -22.74% return.
HYBI
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 7.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -16.29%
- YTD
- -22.74%
- 6M
- -26.41%
- 1Y
- -33.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYBI vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HYBI NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF | 1.56% | 6.97% | 0.14% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -22.74% | -1.09% | 28.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYBI and BTCI is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYBI vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank
HYBI
BTCI
HYBI vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYBI | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.29 | -0.86 | +3.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.51 | -1.14 | +4.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 0.87 | +0.58 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | -0.75 | +5.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.91 | -1.34 | +18.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYBI | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | -0.86 | +3.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | -0.03 | +1.01 |
Drawdowns
HYBI vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYBI drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -44.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBI and BTCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYBI | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -44.98% | +40.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.43% | -44.98% | +43.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -42.87% | +42.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -15.18% | +14.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 25.05% | -24.61% |
Volatility
HYBI vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) is 0.98%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 8.35%. This indicates that HYBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYBI | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 8.35% | -7.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.13% | 30.94% | -28.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.23% | 38.93% | -35.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 40.11% | -35.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 40.11% | -35.17% |
HYBI vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYBI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYBI vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison
HYBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, less than BTCI's 43.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 43.16% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
HYBI NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF | 8.37% | 8.48% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYBI and BTCI have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCI has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to HYBI (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBI dropped -4.68% vs BTCI's -44.98%.
On 1-year performance, HYBI leads with 7.35% vs -33.43% for BTCI. On fees, HYBI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HYBI has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HYBI has performed better with a 7.35% return vs -33.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYBI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 43.16%, compared with 8.37% for HYBI.
HYBI is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HYBI and 0.99% for BTCI.
HYBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYBI and BTCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer