HXS.TO vs. QQCL.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HXS.TO (Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF) and QQCL.TO (Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXS.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while QQCL.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Global X. HXS.TO is passively managed, while QQCL.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, HXS.TO returned 29.00% vs 43.99% for QQCL.TO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HXS.TO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for QQCL.TO.

Performance

HXS.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) and Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXS.TO achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than QQCL.TO's 20.85% return.

HXS.TO

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 7.20%
• YTD: 11.99%
• 6M: 10.17%
• 1Y: 29.00%
• 3Y*: 23.29%
• 5Y*: 16.64%
• 10Y*: 15.90%

QQCL.TO

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 12.39%
• YTD: 20.85%
• 6M: 17.94%
• 1Y: 43.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXS.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HXS.TO Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF	11.99%	11.93%	34.98%	6.56%
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	20.85%	13.10%	41.38%	5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between HXS.TO and QQCL.TO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023	0.87

The correlation between HXS.TO and QQCL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

HXS.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HXS.TO	QQCL.TO
Technology	35.6%	50.0%
Financial Services	11.8%	0.2%
Communication Services	11.2%	16.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	12.5%
Healthcare	8.5%	5.3%
Industrials	8.3%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	8.6%
Energy	3.5%	0.6%
Utilities	2.4%	1.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.3%

Return for Risk

HXS.TO vs. QQCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXS.TO

HXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 71
HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
HXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
HXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 74
HXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
HXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

QQCL.TO

QQCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 81
QQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QQCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
QQCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QQCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QQCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXS.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) and Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HXS.TO	QQCL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	2.81	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	3.65	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.51	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	4.14	-0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.62	15.49	-2.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HXS.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the QQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXS.TO and QQCL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HXS.TO	QQCL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	2.81	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	1.52	-0.51

Drawdowns

HXS.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.42%, which is greater than QQCL.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXS.TO and QQCL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HXS.TO	QQCL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.42%	-25.63%	-1.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.74%	-10.68%	+1.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	0.00%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.54%	-3.32%	-0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	2.85%	-0.55%

Volatility

HXS.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) is 3.27%, while Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that HXS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HXS.TO	QQCL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	4.30%	-1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.83%	12.58%	-3.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.85%	15.74%	-3.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.13%	20.38%	-5.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.53%	20.38%	-3.85%

HXS.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXS.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QQCL.TO's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

HXS.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HXS.TO Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	13.15%	14.54%	11.87%	3.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HXS.TO and QQCL.TO in my portfolio?

HXS.TO and QQCL.TO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HXS.TO or QQCL.TO?

On fees, HXS.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HXS.TO or QQCL.TO?

HXS.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QQCL.TO.

What is the main difference between HXS.TO and QQCL.TO?

HXS.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while QQCL.TO is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for HXS.TO and 0.85% for QQCL.TO.