HXS.TO vs. MTRX.TO
HXS.TO (Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF) and MTRX.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXS.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while MTRX.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Mirae Asset AI Infrastructure CAD Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HXS.TO charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MTRX.TO.
Performance
HXS.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HXS.TO
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 11.68%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 27.21%
- 3Y*
- 23.26%
- 5Y*
- 15.89%
- 10Y*
- —
MTRX.TO
- 1D
- -5.09%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HXS.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HXS.TO Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF | 9.51% |
MTRX.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF | 25.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXS.TO and MTRX.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXS.TO vs. MTRX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXS.TO
MTRX.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HXS.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HXS.TO | MTRX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.70 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HXS.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.41%, which is greater than MTRX.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXS.TO and MTRX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXS.TO | MTRX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.41% | -14.79% | -12.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -5.09% | +3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -3.60% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | — | — |
Volatility
HXS.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXS.TO | MTRX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.37% | 37.98% | -25.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.25% | 37.98% | -22.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 37.98% | -20.24% |
HXS.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXS.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than MTRX.TO's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
HXS.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HXS.TO nor MTRX.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HXS.TO and MTRX.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXS.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXS.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MTRX.TO.
HXS.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while MTRX.TO is Technology Equities. HXS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while MTRX.TO tracks Mirae Asset AI Infrastructure CAD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for HXS.TO and 0.49% for MTRX.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXS.TO and MTRX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer