PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXQ.TO achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS.TO's 44.43% return.


HXQ.TO

1D
0.69%
1M
-5.98%
6M
14.12%
YTD
14.56%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
24.20%
5Y*
16.73%
10Y*
21.14%
ALL TIME*
21.11%

CHPS.TO

1D
0.51%
1M
-10.50%
6M
33.45%
YTD
44.43%
1Y
75.11%
3Y*
40.71%
5Y*
25.57%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$6.23MCA$6.24MCA$7.42M
CA$2.97MCA$3.02MCA$3.91M

HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HXQ.TO
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF
14.56%15.05%35.98%51.16%-27.84%18.37%
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
44.43%45.93%20.38%68.20%-37.86%23.13%

Correlation

The correlation between HXQ.TO and CHPS.TO is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2021

0.80

The correlation between HXQ.TO and CHPS.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO

Technology

55.9%
100.0%

Communication Services

15.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%

-

Healthcare

4.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Industrials

3.1%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Financial Services

0.3%

-

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Technology

HXQ.TO
55.9%
CHPS.TO
100.0%

Communication Services

HXQ.TO
15.8%
CHPS.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

HXQ.TO
13.2%
CHPS.TO

-

Healthcare

HXQ.TO
4.4%
CHPS.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HXQ.TO
4.4%
CHPS.TO

-

Industrials

HXQ.TO
3.1%
CHPS.TO

-

Utilities

HXQ.TO
1.4%
CHPS.TO

-

Basic Materials

HXQ.TO
1.0%
CHPS.TO

-

Energy

HXQ.TO
0.5%
CHPS.TO

-

Financial Services

HXQ.TO
0.3%
CHPS.TO

-

Real Estate

HXQ.TO
0.2%
CHPS.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HXQ.TO
HXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPS.TO
CHPS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HXQ.TOCHPS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

3.20

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.49

12.18

-6.69

HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXQ.TO and CHPS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, smaller than the maximum CHPS.TO drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXQ.TO and CHPS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXQ.TOCHPS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.60%

-48.16%

+16.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-22.71%

+10.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-37.49%

+14.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.60%

-48.16%

+16.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.80%

-17.00%

+9.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-13.75%

+8.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

5.96%

-1.66%

Volatility

HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO) is 6.71%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a volatility of 14.23%. This indicates that HXQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXQ.TOCHPS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.71%

14.23%

-7.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.67%

33.34%

-17.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.98%

39.46%

-20.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.29%

35.50%

-14.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.07%

35.33%

-14.26%

HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPS.TO's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
0.01%0.01%0.20%0.53%0.97%0.01%
HXQ.TO
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HXQ.TO and CHPS.TO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CHPS.TO.

HXQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CHPS.TO is Artificial Intelligence. HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while CHPS.TO tracks PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXQ.TO and 0.63% for CHPS.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXQ.TO and CHPS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer