HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO
HXQ.TO (Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF) and CHPS.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while CHPS.TO is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HXQ.TO returned 16.73%/yr vs 25.57%/yr for CHPS.TO. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HXQ.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CHPS.TO.
Performance
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXQ.TO achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS.TO's 44.43% return.
HXQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- 6M
- 14.12%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 26.47%
- 3Y*
- 24.20%
- 5Y*
- 16.73%
- 10Y*
- 21.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.11%
CHPS.TO
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -10.50%
- 6M
- 33.45%
- YTD
- 44.43%
- 1Y
- 75.11%
- 3Y*
- 40.71%
- 5Y*
- 25.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$6.23M | CA$6.24M | CA$7.42M | |
| CA$2.97M | CA$3.02M | CA$3.91M |
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXQ.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF | 14.56% | 15.05% | 35.98% | 51.16% | -27.84% | 18.37% |
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 44.43% | 45.93% | 20.38% | 68.20% | -37.86% | 23.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXQ.TO and CHPS.TO is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2021 | 0.80 |
The correlation between HXQ.TO and CHPS.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO
Communication Services
HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Healthcare
HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Industrials
HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Utilities
HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Basic Materials
HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Energy
HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Financial Services
HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Real Estate
HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HXQ.TO | CHPS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.31 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 3.20 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 12.18 | -6.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, smaller than the maximum CHPS.TO drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXQ.TO and CHPS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXQ.TO | CHPS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.60% | -48.16% | +16.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -22.71% | +10.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -37.49% | +14.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.60% | -48.16% | +16.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.80% | -17.00% | +9.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -13.75% | +8.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 5.96% | -1.66% |
Volatility
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO) is 6.71%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a volatility of 14.23%. This indicates that HXQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXQ.TO | CHPS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 14.23% | -7.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.67% | 33.34% | -17.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 39.46% | -20.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 35.50% | -14.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 35.33% | -14.26% |
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPS.TO's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
HXQ.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Dividend Comparison
HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.20% | 0.53% | 0.97% | 0.01% |
HXQ.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HXQ.TO and CHPS.TO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CHPS.TO.
HXQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CHPS.TO is Artificial Intelligence. HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while CHPS.TO tracks PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXQ.TO and 0.63% for CHPS.TO.
Find the right allocation for HXQ.TO and CHPS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer