PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXE.TO vs. PHYS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXE.TO vs. PHYS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXE.TO achieves a 44.48% return, which is significantly higher than PHYS.TO's 2.89% return.


HXE.TO

1D
1.90%
1M
0.21%
YTD
44.48%
6M
43.26%
1Y
70.96%
3Y*
28.47%
5Y*
29.94%
10Y*
12.22%

PHYS.TO

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.26%
YTD
2.89%
6M
3.81%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
31.40%
5Y*
20.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXE.TO vs. PHYS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HXE.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF
44.48%17.30%14.39%3.95%53.52%81.48%-33.82%10.05%-21.37%
PHYS.TO
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
2.89%56.35%37.41%10.65%4.96%-5.37%21.38%12.13%4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between HXE.TO and PHYS.TO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2018

-0.06

The correlation between HXE.TO and PHYS.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.06 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXE.TO vs. PHYS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXE.TO
HXE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HXE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

PHYS.TO
PHYS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PHYS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXE.TO vs. PHYS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HXE.TOPHYS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.25

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.55

1.82

+4.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.78

4.49

+14.29

HXE.TO vs. PHYS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the PHYS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXE.TO and PHYS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HXE.TOPHYS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07

1.27

+1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.21

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.60

-0.38

Drawdowns

HXE.TO vs. PHYS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXE.TO drawdown since its inception was -85.92%, which is greater than PHYS.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXE.TO and PHYS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXE.TOPHYS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.92%

-27.08%

-58.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-18.14%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.34%

-18.14%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.83%

-18.14%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.75%

-16.29%

+12.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.81%

-7.83%

-22.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

7.34%

-3.55%

Volatility

HXE.TO vs. PHYS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) at 5.61%. This indicates that HXE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXE.TOPHYS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.76%

5.61%

+4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.90%

22.21%

-3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.30%

26.13%

-2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.24%

17.21%

+12.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.75%

26.82%

+6.93%

Dividends

HXE.TO vs. PHYS.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HXE.TO nor PHYS.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HXE.TO and PHYS.TO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXE.TO and PHYS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer