PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWWD.L vs. PRWU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWWD.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWD.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HWWD.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
4.11%
YTD
13.55%
6M
15.30%
1Y
33.07%
3Y*
22.56%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
12.39%

PRWU.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWWD.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HWWD.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF
13.55%25.22%15.99%22.41%3.14%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%19.27%24.47%2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between HWWD.L and PRWU.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.71

The correlation between HWWD.L and PRWU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HWWD.L vs. PRWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HWWD.L
PRWU.L

Technology

33.9%
27.0%

Financial Services

15.2%
15.8%

Industrials

11.7%
9.9%

Communication Services

8.3%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
10.5%

Basic Materials

5.8%
3.2%

Healthcare

5.4%
10.7%

Energy

4.3%
4.0%

Utilities

3.4%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
6.1%

Real Estate

1.4%
2.1%

Technology

HWWD.L
33.9%
PRWU.L
27.0%

Financial Services

HWWD.L
15.2%
PRWU.L
15.8%

Industrials

HWWD.L
11.7%
PRWU.L
9.9%

Communication Services

HWWD.L
8.3%
PRWU.L
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HWWD.L
8.0%
PRWU.L
10.5%

Basic Materials

HWWD.L
5.8%
PRWU.L
3.2%

Healthcare

HWWD.L
5.4%
PRWU.L
10.7%

Energy

HWWD.L
4.3%
PRWU.L
4.0%

Utilities

HWWD.L
3.4%
PRWU.L
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

HWWD.L
2.2%
PRWU.L
6.1%

Real Estate

HWWD.L
1.4%
PRWU.L
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWWD.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWWD.L
HWWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HWWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HWWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWWD.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWD.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HWWD.LPRWU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.09

HWWD.L vs. PRWU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HWWD.LPRWU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

Drawdowns

HWWD.L vs. PRWU.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWWD.LPRWU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

Volatility

HWWD.L vs. PRWU.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWWD.LPRWU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

HWWD.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWWD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HWWD.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

HWWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while PRWU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HWWD.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF
1.30%1.41%1.61%1.90%2.10%1.52%1.35%2.00%2.19%1.76%1.87%2.04%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWWD.L and PRWU.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HWWD.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HWWD.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWWD.L and PRWU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer