PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HWWD.L vs. HMWD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HWWD.L vs. HMWD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HWWD.L (HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF) and HMWD.L (HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds from HSBC tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HWWD.L returned 12.39%/yr vs 13.25%/yr for HMWD.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HWWD.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HMWD.L.

Performance

HWWD.L vs. HMWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWD.L) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWWD.L achieves a 13.55% return, which is significantly higher than HMWD.L's 9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, HWWD.L has underperformed HMWD.L with an annualized return of 12.39%, while HMWD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.25% annualized return.

HWWD.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
4.11%
YTD
13.55%
6M
15.30%
1Y
33.07%
3Y*
22.56%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
12.39%

HMWD.L

1D
0.09%
1M
4.12%
YTD
9.88%
6M
11.06%
1Y
26.15%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
13.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWWD.L vs. HMWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWWD.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF		13.55%25.22%15.99%22.41%-17.65%20.14%14.94%22.38%-10.70%23.96%
HMWD.L
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF		9.88%21.06%19.13%24.63%-18.24%22.41%16.43%27.43%-8.89%23.12%

Correlation

The correlation between HWWD.L and HMWD.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2014

0.95

The correlation between HWWD.L and HMWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

HWWD.L vs. HMWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HWWD.L
HMWD.L

Technology

33.9%
28.3%

Financial Services

15.2%
15.7%

Industrials

11.7%
11.5%

Communication Services

8.3%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
9.2%

Basic Materials

5.8%
3.3%

Healthcare

5.4%
8.8%

Energy

4.3%
4.2%

Utilities

3.4%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
5.3%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.9%

Technology

HWWD.L
33.9%
HMWD.L
28.3%

Financial Services

HWWD.L
15.2%
HMWD.L
15.7%

Industrials

HWWD.L
11.7%
HMWD.L
11.5%

Communication Services

HWWD.L
8.3%
HMWD.L
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HWWD.L
8.0%
HMWD.L
9.2%

Basic Materials

HWWD.L
5.8%
HMWD.L
3.3%

Healthcare

HWWD.L
5.4%
HMWD.L
8.8%

Energy

HWWD.L
4.3%
HMWD.L
4.2%

Utilities

HWWD.L
3.4%
HMWD.L
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

HWWD.L
2.2%
HMWD.L
5.3%

Real Estate

HWWD.L
1.4%
HMWD.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF

HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF

Often compared with HWWD.L:
HWWD.L vs. IFSW.LHWWD.L vs. GERD.DEHWWD.L vs. VUSA.LHWWD.L vs. HMUD.LHWWD.L vs. HUKX.LHWWD.L vs. MVOL.LHWWD.L vs. MWRD.L
Often compared with HMWD.L:
HMWD.L vs. VWRL.ASHMWD.L vs. IWDA.LHMWD.L vs. VDIV.DEHMWD.L vs. TRET.ASHMWD.L vs. VWCE.DEHMWD.L vs. VWRL.LHMWD.L vs. EIMI.L

Return for Risk

HWWD.L vs. HMWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HWWD.L
HWWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HWWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HWWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
HMWD.L
HMWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
HMWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
HMWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWWD.L vs. HMWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWD.L) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HWWD.LHMWD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.67
2.19

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.86
3.29

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.40

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

3.14

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.09

13.35

+2.74

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HWWD.L vs. HMWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the HMWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWWD.L and HMWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HWWD.LHMWD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.19

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.77

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.83

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.74

-0.10

Drawdowns

HWWD.L vs. HMWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWWD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, roughly equal to the maximum HMWD.L drawdown of -34.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWWD.L and HMWD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HWWD.LHMWD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-34.03%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-8.29%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-17.57%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.22%

-26.00%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.76%

-34.03%

+0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.40%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-4.57%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.95%

+0.10%

Volatility

HWWD.L vs. HMWD.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWD.L) at 3.41%. This indicates that HWWD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HWWD.LHMWD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

3.41%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

9.13%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

11.87%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

15.57%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

15.85%

-0.17%

HWWD.L vs. HMWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWWD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HMWD.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HWWD.L vs. HMWD.L - Dividend Comparison

HWWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than HMWD.L's 1.17% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMWD.L
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF		1.17%1.24%1.43%1.57%1.79%1.31%1.44%1.91%2.23%1.81%2.00%1.93%
HWWD.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF		1.30%1.41%1.61%1.90%2.10%1.52%1.35%2.00%2.19%1.76%1.87%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.96, HWWD.L and HMWD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, HMWD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMWD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HWWD.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HWWD.L and 0.15% for HMWD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWWD.L and HMWD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer