PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWWD.L vs. CHRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWWD.L vs. CHRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWD.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HWWD.L is traded in USD, while CHRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CHRG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWWD.L achieves a 13.55% return, which is significantly lower than CHRG.L's 33.17% return.


HWWD.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
4.11%
YTD
13.55%
6M
15.30%
1Y
33.07%
3Y*
22.56%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
12.39%

CHRG.L

1D
-0.88%
1M
2.18%
YTD
33.17%
6M
31.20%
1Y
103.77%
3Y*
17.35%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWWD.L vs. CHRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HWWD.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF
13.55%25.22%15.99%22.41%-17.65%20.14%24.69%
CHRG.L
WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc
33.17%55.18%-13.38%-4.90%-27.75%13.85%85.14%

Correlation

The correlation between HWWD.L and CHRG.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020

0.71

The correlation between HWWD.L and CHRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

HWWD.L vs. CHRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HWWD.L
CHRG.L

Technology

33.9%
8.2%

Financial Services

15.2%

-

Industrials

11.7%
48.7%

Communication Services

8.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
15.5%

Basic Materials

5.8%
20.3%

Healthcare

5.4%

-

Energy

4.3%
6.1%

Utilities

3.4%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
0.0%

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Technology

HWWD.L
33.9%
CHRG.L
8.2%

Financial Services

HWWD.L
15.2%
CHRG.L

-

Industrials

HWWD.L
11.7%
CHRG.L
48.7%

Communication Services

HWWD.L
8.3%
CHRG.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

HWWD.L
8.0%
CHRG.L
15.5%

Basic Materials

HWWD.L
5.8%
CHRG.L
20.3%

Healthcare

HWWD.L
5.4%
CHRG.L

-

Energy

HWWD.L
4.3%
CHRG.L
6.1%

Utilities

HWWD.L
3.4%
CHRG.L
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

HWWD.L
2.2%
CHRG.L
0.0%

Real Estate

HWWD.L
1.4%
CHRG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWWD.L vs. CHRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWWD.L
HWWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HWWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HWWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

CHRG.L
CHRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWWD.L vs. CHRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWD.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HWWD.LCHRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.50

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

3.35

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.09

6.55

+9.54

HWWD.L vs. CHRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWWD.L and CHRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HWWD.LCHRG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

1.96

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.15

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.52

+0.12

Drawdowns

HWWD.L vs. CHRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWWD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum CHRG.L drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWWD.L and CHRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWWD.LCHRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-55.49%

+21.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-30.81%

+22.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-40.33%

+24.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.22%

-55.49%

+29.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-3.73%

+3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-25.20%

+19.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

15.78%

-13.73%

Volatility

HWWD.L vs. CHRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWD.L) is 4.47%, while WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that HWWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWWD.LCHRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

10.69%

-6.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

20.23%

-10.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

52.78%

-40.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

31.81%

-16.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

31.47%

-15.79%

HWWD.L vs. CHRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWWD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CHRG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWWD.L vs. CHRG.L - Dividend Comparison

HWWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while CHRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHRG.L
WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HWWD.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF
1.30%1.41%1.61%1.90%2.10%1.52%1.35%2.00%2.19%1.76%1.87%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWWD.L and CHRG.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HWWD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HWWD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CHRG.L.

HWWD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CHRG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. HWWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HWWD.L and 0.40% for CHRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWWD.L and CHRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer