HWSIX vs. NSVAX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

HWSIX (Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund) and NSVAX (Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HWSIX returned 11.42%/yr vs 10.92%/yr for NSVAX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HWSIX charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for NSVAX.

Performance

HWSIX vs. NSVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HWSIX having a 25.58% return and NSVAX slightly lower at 25.14%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HWSIX having a 11.42% annualized return and NSVAX not far behind at 10.92%.

HWSIX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 6.58%
• 6M: 16.88%
• YTD: 25.58%
• 1Y: 32.20%
• 3Y*: 12.09%
• 5Y*: 12.25%
• 10Y*: 11.42%
• ALL TIME*: 9.83%

NSVAX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.83%
• 6M: 16.67%
• YTD: 25.14%
• 1Y: 40.56%
• 3Y*: 15.86%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: 10.92%
• ALL TIME*: 10.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NSVAX Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

HWSIX vs. NSVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund	25.58%	1.60%	5.00%	18.85%	2.97%	35.54%	-0.31%	20.54%	-15.03%	7.66%
NSVAX Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II	25.14%	8.20%	11.25%	14.10%	-13.70%	34.27%	10.11%	20.65%	-17.48%	10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between HWSIX and NSVAX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2002	0.93

The correlation between HWSIX and NSVAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HWSIX vs. NSVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HWSIX

HWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 72
HWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
HWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
HWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
HWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
HWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

NSVAX

NSVAX Risk / Return Rank: 90
NSVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
NSVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
NSVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
NSVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
NSVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HWSIX vs. NSVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HWSIX	NSVAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.30	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	3.34	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.40	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	4.07	-1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.66	14.38	-4.71

HWSIX vs. NSVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the NSVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWSIX and NSVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HWSIX vs. NSVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWSIX drawdown since its inception was -72.00%, which is greater than NSVAX's maximum drawdown of -59.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWSIX and NSVAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HWSIX	NSVAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.00%	-59.32%	-12.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.01%	-9.51%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.92%	-27.11%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.92%	-27.11%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.67%	-48.33%	-5.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-1.67%	+1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.03%	-9.68%	-2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	2.69%	+0.27%

Volatility

HWSIX vs. NSVAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) is 2.94%, while Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that HWSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NSVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HWSIX	NSVAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.94%	3.69%	-0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.45%	11.71%	-1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.48%	16.90%	-0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.21%	22.19%	-0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.51%	23.83%	+0.68%

HWSIX vs. NSVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWSIX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than NSVAX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

HWSIX vs. NSVAX - Dividend Comparison

HWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than NSVAX's 14.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund	0.80%	1.01%	8.35%	1.90%	13.44%	0.36%	0.80%	4.89%	9.84%	5.07%	0.41%	11.78%
NSVAX Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II	14.96%	15.89%	29.38%	6.93%	6.46%	13.95%	0.83%	3.68%	14.97%	9.10%	5.23%	12.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HWSIX and NSVAX in my portfolio?

HWSIX and NSVAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HWSIX or NSVAX?

NSVAX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to HWSIX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWSIX dropped -72.00% vs NSVAX's -59.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NSVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.