PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWSAX vs. BOSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWSAX vs. BOSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) and Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWSAX achieves a 17.59% return, which is significantly lower than BOSVX's 19.41% return. Over the past 10 years, HWSAX has underperformed BOSVX with an annualized return of 10.74%, while BOSVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.


HWSAX

1D
1.03%
1M
2.96%
YTD
17.59%
6M
15.77%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
10.74%

BOSVX

1D
1.12%
1M
1.97%
YTD
19.41%
6M
18.62%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*
11.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWSAX vs. BOSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWSAX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A
17.59%1.38%4.77%18.56%2.81%35.32%-0.50%20.26%-15.23%7.39%
BOSVX
Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund
19.41%9.78%4.21%18.18%-4.27%48.03%0.83%13.90%-17.15%5.91%

Correlation

The correlation between HWSAX and BOSVX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2011

0.94

The correlation between HWSAX and BOSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWSAX vs. BOSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWSAX
HWSAX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
HWSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HWSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

BOSVX
BOSVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BOSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BOSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWSAX vs. BOSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) and Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HWSAXBOSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

5.55

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.23

16.24

-6.02

HWSAX vs. BOSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the BOSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWSAX and BOSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HWSAXBOSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

2.34

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.44

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.46

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.50

-0.02

Drawdowns

HWSAX vs. BOSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWSAX drawdown since its inception was -72.14%, which is greater than BOSVX's maximum drawdown of -57.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWSAX and BOSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWSAXBOSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.14%

-57.14%

-15.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-8.27%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.98%

-28.71%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

-28.71%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.82%

-57.14%

+3.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.96%

-8.58%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.82%

+0.24%

Volatility

HWSAX vs. BOSVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) is 3.76%, while Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that HWSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWSAXBOSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

4.64%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.25%

13.25%

-2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.23%

19.64%

-2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.54%

22.62%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.62%

25.05%

-0.43%

HWSAX vs. BOSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWSAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than BOSVX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWSAX vs. BOSVX - Dividend Comparison

HWSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than BOSVX's 8.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOSVX
Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund
8.36%9.99%9.71%8.55%21.96%4.12%1.21%0.99%10.36%6.66%0.89%1.00%
HWSAX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A
0.59%0.69%8.19%1.79%13.39%0.22%0.63%4.62%9.45%4.80%0.00%11.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWSAX and BOSVX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOSVX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to HWSAX (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWSAX dropped -72.14% vs BOSVX's -57.14%.

BOSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWSAX and BOSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer