HWCIX vs. HWGIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HWCIX (Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund) and HWGIX (Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund) are both mutual funds - HWCIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Hotchkis & Wiley, while HWGIX is a Global Equities fund managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. Over the past 10 years, HWCIX returned 12.91%/yr vs 11.62%/yr for HWGIX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HWCIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for HWGIX.

Performance

HWCIX vs. HWGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund (HWCIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HWCIX having a 5.13% return and HWGIX slightly lower at 4.97%. Over the past 10 years, HWCIX has outperformed HWGIX with an annualized return of 12.91%, while HWGIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.62% annualized return.

HWCIX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -1.53%
• YTD: 5.13%
• 6M: 4.64%
• 1Y: 19.13%
• 3Y*: 16.69%
• 5Y*: 10.69%
• 10Y*: 12.91%

HWGIX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 4.97%
• 6M: 4.84%
• 1Y: 17.52%
• 3Y*: 18.74%
• 5Y*: 10.96%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWCIX vs. HWGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HWCIX Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund	5.13%	17.09%	12.80%	19.01%	-4.35%	32.46%	0.42%	29.30%	-14.74%	18.37%
HWGIX Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund	4.97%	23.76%	9.46%	28.00%	-11.65%	26.67%	-0.59%	24.57%	-16.08%	16.73%

Correlation

The correlation between HWCIX and HWGIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.95

The correlation between HWCIX and HWGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HWCIX vs. HWGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWCIX

HWCIX Risk / Return Rank: 42
HWCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
HWCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
HWCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
HWCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
HWCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

HWGIX

HWGIX Risk / Return Rank: 27
HWGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
HWGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
HWGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
HWGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
HWGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWCIX vs. HWGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund (HWCIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HWCIX	HWGIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.39	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.03	+0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.25	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	1.83	+1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.35	6.13	+3.22

HWCIX vs. HWGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the HWGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWCIX and HWGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HWCIX vs. HWGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWCIX drawdown since its inception was -69.74%, which is greater than HWGIX's maximum drawdown of -46.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWCIX and HWGIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HWCIX	HWGIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.74%	-46.71%	-23.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.33%	-9.83%	+3.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.52%	-14.17%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.62%	-28.63%	+5.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.31%	-46.71%	-0.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.19%	-2.83%	-1.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.32%	-6.67%	-5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	2.93%	-0.86%

Volatility

HWCIX vs. HWGIX - Volatility Comparison

Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund (HWCIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX) have volatilities of 4.13% and 4.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HWCIX	HWGIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	4.25%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.10%	9.59%	-0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.14%	12.97%	+0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.08%	17.47%	+0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.62%	20.64%	+0.98%

HWCIX vs. HWGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWCIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than HWGIX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

HWCIX vs. HWGIX - Dividend Comparison

HWCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.60%, more than HWGIX's 9.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HWCIX Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund	10.60%	11.15%	13.85%	1.56%	1.12%	1.10%	1.99%	1.82%	1.62%	1.82%	5.17%	1.49%
HWGIX Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund	9.18%	9.63%	15.10%	11.01%	3.92%	0.68%	1.49%	2.56%	10.34%	5.50%	0.80%	7.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HWCIX and HWGIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, HWCIX and HWGIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HWCIX or HWGIX?

HWGIX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to HWCIX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWCIX dropped -69.74% vs HWGIX's -46.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HWCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.