HWMIX vs. FLCGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HWMIX (Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund) and FLCGX (Meeder Quantex Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HWMIX returned 9.67%/yr vs 10.62%/yr for FLCGX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HWMIX charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.62%/yr for FLCGX.

Performance

HWMIX vs. FLCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWMIX achieves a 14.54% return, which is significantly higher than FLCGX's 8.59% return. Over the past 10 years, HWMIX has underperformed FLCGX with an annualized return of 9.67%, while FLCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.62% annualized return.

HWMIX

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 14.54%
• 6M: 15.37%
• 1Y: 32.28%
• 3Y*: 15.00%
• 5Y*: 9.52%
• 10Y*: 9.67%

FLCGX

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 3.88%
• YTD: 8.59%
• 6M: 8.37%
• 1Y: 24.13%
• 3Y*: 25.84%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: 10.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWMIX vs. FLCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund	14.54%	7.87%	3.62%	19.87%	1.63%	39.18%	0.49%	12.97%	-19.32%	7.69%
FLCGX Meeder Quantex Fund	8.59%	19.10%	36.38%	14.81%	-13.77%	27.27%	-5.36%	18.48%	-12.35%	13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between HWMIX and FLCGX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between HWMIX and FLCGX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

HWMIX vs. FLCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWMIX

HWMIX Risk / Return Rank: 57
HWMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
HWMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
HWMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
HWMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
HWMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

FLCGX

FLCGX Risk / Return Rank: 50
FLCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FLCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FLCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FLCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FLCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWMIX vs. FLCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HWMIX	FLCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.00	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.77	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.36	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.38	2.75	+1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.30	11.85	+0.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HWMIX vs. FLCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the FLCGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWMIX and FLCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HWMIX	FLCGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	2.00	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.51	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.45	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.37	+0.11

Drawdowns

HWMIX vs. FLCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWMIX drawdown since its inception was -69.84%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCGX drawdown of -66.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWMIX and FLCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HWMIX	FLCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.84%	-66.94%	-2.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.16%	-8.86%	+1.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.90%	-17.47%	-8.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.90%	-32.83%	+6.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.21%	-50.45%	-12.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-0.70%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.83%	-12.88%	+2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	2.05%	+0.49%

Volatility

HWMIX vs. FLCGX - Volatility Comparison

Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX) at 3.27%. This indicates that HWMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HWMIX	FLCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	3.27%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.84%	9.33%	+1.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.27%	12.22%	+4.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.20%	22.38%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.56%	23.47%	+2.09%

HWMIX vs. FLCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWMIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCGX's 1.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

HWMIX vs. FLCGX - Dividend Comparison

HWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than FLCGX's 7.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLCGX Meeder Quantex Fund	7.77%	8.48%	39.58%	1.17%	2.73%	16.70%	0.53%	0.67%	0.00%	2.92%	2.00%	17.06%
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund	1.22%	1.39%	1.15%	0.28%	0.49%	1.28%	2.25%	1.60%	2.99%	6.72%	1.53%	14.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HWMIX and FLCGX in my portfolio?

HWMIX and FLCGX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HWMIX or FLCGX?

HWMIX has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to FLCGX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWMIX dropped -69.84% vs FLCGX's -66.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.