HWMIX vs. FCVFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C (FCVFX).
HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997. FCVFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 23, 2003.
Performance
HWMIX vs. FCVFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWMIX vs. FCVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.50% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.69% |
FCVFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C | 3.39% | 10.14% | 24.29% | 18.53% | -10.07% | 33.72% | 8.57% | 30.36% | -18.65% | 14.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWMIX achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly higher than FCVFX's 3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, HWMIX has underperformed FCVFX with an annualized return of 9.06%, while FCVFX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.47% annualized return.
HWMIX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 6.50%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 20.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.06%
FCVFX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -4.27%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWMIX vs. FCVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWMIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FCVFX's 1.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWMIX vs. FCVFX — Risk / Return Rank
HWMIX
FCVFX
HWMIX vs. FCVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C (FCVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWMIX | FCVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 0.94 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.46 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.39 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | 5.58 | -0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWMIX | FCVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 0.94 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.52 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.51 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.40 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWMIX and FCVFX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWMIX vs. FCVFX - Dividend Comparison
HWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than FCVFX's 7.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.31% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
FCVFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C | 7.95% | 8.22% | 25.20% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 4.16% | 0.00% | 2.46% | 14.34% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 1.94% |
Drawdowns
HWMIX vs. FCVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWMIX drawdown since its inception was -69.84%, which is greater than FCVFX's maximum drawdown of -65.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWMIX and FCVFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWMIX | FCVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.84% | -65.18% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | -9.99% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | -23.11% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -48.67% | -14.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -6.95% | +3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -9.12% | -1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 3.72% | +0.44% |
Volatility
HWMIX vs. FCVFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) is 4.20%, while Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C (FCVFX) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that HWMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWMIX | FCVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 6.10% | -1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 11.96% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.85% | 21.64% | +2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 21.31% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.61% | 22.52% | +3.09% |