HWMIX vs. FCMVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX).
HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997. FCMVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 25, 2017.
Performance
HWMIX vs. FCMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWMIX vs. FCMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.74% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.95% |
FCMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund | 4.54% | 12.62% | 87.16% | 23.07% | -10.26% | 34.12% | 0.52% | 23.65% | -18.69% | 12.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWMIX achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly higher than FCMVX's 4.54% return.
HWMIX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
FCMVX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -4.16%
- YTD
- 4.54%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- 1Y
- 21.28%
- 3Y*
- 38.46%
- 5Y*
- 22.38%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWMIX vs. FCMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWMIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FCMVX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWMIX vs. FCMVX — Risk / Return Rank
HWMIX
FCMVX
HWMIX vs. FCMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWMIX | FCMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 1.08 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.64 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.22 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 1.65 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 6.66 | -1.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWMIX | FCMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.08 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.37 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.33 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWMIX and FCMVX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWMIX vs. FCMVX - Dividend Comparison
HWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than FCMVX's 4.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.31% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
FCMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund | 4.73% | 6.68% | 76.67% | 1.29% | 1.68% | 1.39% | 2.19% | 1.68% | 2.99% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HWMIX vs. FCMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWMIX drawdown since its inception was -69.84%, which is greater than FCMVX's maximum drawdown of -44.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWMIX and FCMVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWMIX | FCMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.84% | -44.63% | -25.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.87% | -10.21% | -6.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | -38.56% | +12.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -12.75% | +9.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -9.44% | -1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 3.62% | +0.53% |
Volatility
HWMIX vs. FCMVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) is 4.30%, while Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that HWMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWMIX | FCMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 6.42% | -2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 12.05% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.86% | 21.56% | +2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 60.56% | -38.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.62% | 48.19% | -22.57% |