HWM vs. PG
HWM (Howmet Aerospace Inc.) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. HWM operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, HWM returned 33.28%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for PG. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HWM vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWM achieves a 29.23% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, HWM has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 33.28%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.
HWM
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- YTD
- 29.23%
- 6M
- 33.60%
- 1Y
- 54.66%
- 3Y*
- 79.69%
- 5Y*
- 50.00%
- 10Y*
- 33.28%
PG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- -5.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
HWM vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 29.23% | 87.95% | 102.71% | 37.84% | 24.16% | 11.67% | 21.03% | 83.54% | -37.43% | 48.40% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 5.93% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between HWM and PG is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1970 | 0.23 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HWM and PG has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
HWM:
$106.66B
PG:
$361.53B
HWM:
$4.31
PG:
$5.23
HWM:
61.42
PG:
28.63
HWM:
1.04
PG:
7.00
HWM:
12.42
PG:
4.20
HWM:
19.32
PG:
6.70
HWM:
$8.62B
PG:
$86.72B
HWM:
$2.81B
PG:
$43.64B
HWM:
$2.66B
PG:
$22.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HWM vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
HWM
PG
HWM vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HWM | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.97 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | -0.37 | +3.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | -0.68 | +10.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HWM vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWM drawdown since its inception was -88.30%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWM and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWM | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.30% | -54.25% | -34.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | -15.52% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.41% | -21.15% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.61% | -23.77% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.81% | -23.77% | -41.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.26% | -13.29% | +10.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.00% | -12.16% | -18.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.61% | 8.80% | -3.19% |
Volatility
HWM vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 6.99%. This indicates that HWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HWM | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.03% | 6.99% | +4.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.03% | 15.01% | +10.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.46% | 18.78% | +12.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.20% | 17.82% | +14.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.82% | 19.05% | +20.77% |
Dividends
HWM vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
HWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than PG's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 0.39% | 1.42% | 0.88% | 40.49% | 1.22% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.85% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
HWM vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Howmet Aerospace Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HWM vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
HWM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
HWM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
HWM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HWM and PG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HWM has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to PG (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWM dropped -88.30% vs PG's -54.25%.
HWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HWM and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer