HWM vs. L.TO
HWM (Howmet Aerospace Inc.) and L.TO (Loblaw Companies Limited) are both stocks. HWM operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while L.TO operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, HWM returned 33.65%/yr vs 25.40%/yr for L.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HWM vs. L.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HWM is traded in USD, while L.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the L.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWM achieves a 36.89% return, which is significantly higher than L.TO's -0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, HWM has outperformed L.TO with an annualized return of 33.65%, while L.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 25.40% annualized return.
HWM
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 36.89%
- 6M
- 34.81%
- 1Y
- 62.11%
- 3Y*
- 82.73%
- 5Y*
- 53.11%
- 10Y*
- 33.65%
L.TO
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 11.22%
- 3Y*
- 31.01%
- 5Y*
- 29.41%
- 10Y*
- 25.40%
HWM vs. L.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 36.89% | 87.95% | 102.71% | 37.84% | 24.16% | 11.67% | 21.03% | 83.54% | -37.43% | 48.40% |
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | -0.85% | 41.13% | 42.49% | 16.45% | 14.71% | 77.01% | 3.78% | 22.83% | 39.76% | 11.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between HWM and L.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2006 | 0.16 |
The correlation between HWM and L.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HWM:
$112.99B
L.TO:
CA$74.67B
HWM:
$4.31
L.TO:
CA$3.72
HWM:
65.07
L.TO:
17.05
HWM:
13.16
L.TO:
0.73
HWM:
20.46
L.TO:
6.85
HWM:
$8.62B
L.TO:
CA$64.25B
HWM:
$2.81B
L.TO:
CA$19.91B
HWM:
$2.66B
L.TO:
CA$7.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HWM vs. L.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HWM
L.TO
HWM vs. L.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HWM | L.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.11 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | 0.76 | +3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.10 | 1.71 | +9.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HWM vs. L.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWM drawdown since its inception was -88.30%, which is greater than L.TO's maximum drawdown of -52.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWM and L.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWM | L.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.30% | -52.16% | -36.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | -14.75% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.41% | -14.75% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.22% | -18.22% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.81% | -25.03% | -39.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -11.47% | +10.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.00% | -7.71% | -23.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.61% | 6.58% | -0.97% |
Volatility
HWM vs. L.TO - Volatility Comparison
Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) has a higher volatility of 10.24% compared to Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) at 6.70%. This indicates that HWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than L.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HWM | L.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.24% | 6.70% | +3.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.16% | 16.21% | +8.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.74% | 21.15% | +10.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.21% | 19.82% | +12.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.83% | 21.30% | +18.53% |
Dividends
HWM vs. L.TO - Dividend Comparison
HWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than L.TO's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.17% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 0.39% | 1.42% | 0.88% | 40.49% | 1.22% |
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | 0.91% | 2.19% | 4.20% | 5.43% | 5.28% | 5.40% | 8.15% | 7.40% | 6.45% | 7.84% | 7.27% | 7.61% |
Financials
HWM vs. L.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Loblaw Companies Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HWM vs. L.TO - Profitability Comparison
HWM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
L.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a gross profit of 4.54B and revenue of 14.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.
HWM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.
L.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported an operating income of 1.01B and revenue of 14.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
HWM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.
L.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a net income of 594.00M and revenue of 14.48B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HWM and L.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HWM and L.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer