PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWM vs. CRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HWM vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWM achieves a 29.23% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -37.06% return. Over the past 10 years, HWM has outperformed CRM with an annualized return of 33.28%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.


HWM

1D
0.03%
1M
-3.09%
YTD
29.23%
6M
33.60%
1Y
54.66%
3Y*
79.69%
5Y*
50.00%
10Y*
33.28%

CRM

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
-37.06%
6M
-36.31%
1Y
-35.16%
3Y*
-6.88%
5Y*
-6.82%
10Y*
7.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWM vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
29.23%87.95%102.71%37.84%24.16%11.67%21.03%83.54%-37.43%48.40%
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
-37.06%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%18.74%33.98%49.33%

Correlation

The correlation between HWM and CRM is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2004

0.33

The correlation between HWM and CRM shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HWM:

$106.66B

CRM:

$144.49B

EPS

HWM:

$4.31

CRM:

$8.59

PE Ratio

HWM:

61.42

CRM:

19.31

PEG Ratio

HWM:

1.04

CRM:

0.04

PS Ratio

HWM:

12.42

CRM:

3.62

PB Ratio

HWM:

19.32

CRM:

4.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

HWM:

$8.62B

CRM:

$42.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HWM:

$2.81B

CRM:

$33.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

HWM:

$2.66B

CRM:

$12.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWM vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWM
HWM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWM vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HWMCRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.84

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

-0.95

+4.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

-1.78

+11.55

HWM vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWM and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HWM vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWM drawdown since its inception was -88.30%, which is greater than CRM's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWM and CRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWMCRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.30%

-70.50%

-17.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.89%

-39.36%

+23.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-54.70%

+35.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.61%

-58.62%

+37.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.81%

-58.62%

-6.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.26%

-54.33%

+51.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.00%

-16.15%

-14.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.61%

20.92%

-15.31%

Volatility

HWM vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) is 11.03%, while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 16.76%. This indicates that HWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWMCRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.03%

16.76%

-5.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.03%

31.59%

-6.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.46%

38.09%

-6.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.20%

37.07%

-4.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.82%

35.38%

+4.44%

Dividends

HWM vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

HWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than CRM's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
1.28%0.63%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
0.18%0.21%0.24%0.31%0.25%0.13%0.05%0.39%1.42%0.88%40.49%1.22%

Financials

HWM vs. CRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Salesforce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
2.31B
11.13B
(HWM) Total Revenue
(CRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HWM vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Salesforce, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
36.9%
76.9%
Portfolio components
HWM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

HWM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

HWM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HWM and CRM have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRM has higher volatility (16.76%) compared to HWM (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWM dropped -88.30% vs CRM's -70.50%.

HWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWM and CRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer