PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWAY vs. BILT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWAY vs. BILT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWAY achieves a 22.94% return, which is significantly higher than BILT's 13.73% return.


HWAY

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.03%
6M
12.94%
YTD
22.94%
1Y
32.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.86%

BILT

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.54%
6M
9.37%
YTD
13.73%
1Y
17.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.26M$1.67M$1.68M
$22.82K$23.54K$29.88K

HWAY vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HWAY
Themes US Infrastructure ETF
22.94%5.47%
BILT
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
13.73%4.16%

Correlation

The correlation between HWAY and BILT is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWAY vs. BILT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HWAY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BILT
BILT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HWAY vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HWAYBILTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

3.25

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.98

9.73

-1.75

HWAY vs. BILT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the BILT Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWAY and BILT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HWAY vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWAY drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWAY and BILT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWAYBILTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-5.38%

-20.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.63%

-5.38%

-7.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.57%

-2.73%

-1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-1.37%

-3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

1.79%

+1.94%

Volatility

HWAY vs. BILT - Volatility Comparison

Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) at 2.62%. This indicates that HWAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWAYBILTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

2.62%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.68%

8.46%

+8.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.52%

10.32%

+10.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.22%

10.30%

+11.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.22%

10.30%

+11.92%

HWAY vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWAY has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BILT's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWAY vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison

HWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%.


PositionTTM20252024
BILT
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
5.73%0.99%0.00%
HWAY
Themes US Infrastructure ETF
1.05%1.29%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWAY and BILT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HWAY has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to BILT (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWAY dropped -25.96% vs BILT's -5.38%.

On 1-year performance, HWAY leads with 32.92% vs 17.39% for BILT. On fees, HWAY is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, BILT has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HWAY has performed better with a 32.92% return vs 17.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HWAY is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BILT.

BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.73%, compared with 1.05% for HWAY.

They also come from different issuers: Themes and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HWAY and 0.60% for BILT.

BILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWAY and BILT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer